10
submitted 3 months ago by NotACube@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 15 points 3 months ago

The green party, I suppose we were being too harsh when saying they're nimbys who don't want wind turbines built.

They're nimbys who don't want lots of other things built too

[-] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 8 points 3 months ago

It’s always a worry about where there is a better option however, sooner rather than later something has to happen. Is this really NIMBYs pushing back?

[-] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 months ago

It is pure nimbyism. There have already been consultations which showed other options would be more expensive and slower, but also more environmentally destructive than pylons. Ramsay - the Green's co-leader - doesn't like the result of the consultations so deploying the classic nimby tactic of demanding more consultations.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 3 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A newly elected Green Party MP has called for a "pause" on a proposed 114-mile (184-km) electricity pylon route across East Anglia.The National Grid wants to build the new power lines from Norwich to Tilbury in Essex, which it has called "vital infrastructure".Adrian Ramsay, the Waveney Valley MP, said the proposal required a "proper options assessment" that should be considered by the new Labour government.The government's Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said the public consultation was ongoing, but the UK needed to improve "outdated" energy infrastructure.

Having arrived for his first day at the House of Commons, Mr Ramsay, who is the Greens' co-leader nationally, said: "There's a controversial proposal... where there's huge local concern about the impact on agricultural land, on traffic, on local communities, on the landscape.

"So what I'm arguing for is a pause while the other options are considered, because of course we need the infrastructure; it's a matter of doing it in the right way that has a long-term benefit."

National Grid, a private firm, wants to build the power line to carry 50 gigawatts of electricity generated by offshore windfarms and has said the previous government had set a target of doing this by 2030.Apart from underground sections beneath the River Stour and Dedham Vale and at Great Horkesley in Essex, it would be carried on pylons.Mr Ramsay said Green councillors who run Mid Suffolk District Council had been arguing for an alternative to be properly considered, including the idea of an offshore grid.But in a statement, National Grid said it had carefully assessed several alternative options, including offshore options, adding it had shaped its policy around public consultations already undertaken.

Meanwhile, Mr Ramsay welcomed the decision by Labour to lift a de facto ban on onshore wind farms.

"That is welcome, yes, absolutely we need to see more renewable energy in the UK of various sorts, done in the right way, and so Labour have taken a step in the right direction with that," he said.He also called for "a nationwide programme to get people's homes insulated in a way that keeps bills down, keeps homes warm, and that's something we'll be pushing the government to do much more on".


The original article contains 483 words, the summary contains 369 words. Saved 24%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Ugh why Green Party, why? This isn't why I voted for you.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 0 points 3 months ago

Green party: Fuck the planet. Pylons are ugly.

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
10 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3070 readers
67 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS