this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
1323 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4307 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 160 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He's not resigning from a position that is a lifetime appointment.

So sick of hearing these moronic articles.

Either get the goddamn Department of Justice or IRS involved in this and see if these trips and other gifts were illegal, or STFU. Yes, we all know he's a corrupt piece of shit, but he's not resigning, and it sure as hell doesn't look like any governmental departments even want to try going after him for corruption.

[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 119 points 1 year ago (5 children)

These "Moronic articles" places him into the spotlight.

There is very few things that can be considered an "Annoyance" to rich folk, being in that spotlight is one of them.

People like Clarence Thomas want to go on vacation and not worry about being recognized in public.

Being in the spotlight means they have to hire more security, it means background checks, it means more people in your private life, it means always looking over your shoulder because the "media" is everyone with a smart phone nowadays.

So while I would love to see less topics on Clarence Thomas that doesn't involve a jail cell. The attention on his shadiness, is the 2nd best for now.

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

He knows he's essentially untouchable, so all the things you list, he probably doesn't give a flying fuck about. Lazy Merrit Garland isn't going to open an investigation on Thomas and it looks like neither is the IRS to see if there were any tax shenanigans going on. And our corporate news media is more on his side, than the side of The People. 90% of these stories are utterly pointless. They are filler to get clicks

[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

You can be untouchable and still have social pressures.

Just as you can be a fly could do virtually nothing to harm a living human being, but buzz around his ear enough and they will do anything to get rid of the buzzing.

The point is to be within the law, and be annoying.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, you are not the target audience for this article.

Most Americans are not informed at all, and no matter how stupid it may seem, they need the most watered down solution shoved in their face repeatedly just so they recognize the problem in the first place

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Based on how often he and Alito are crying out about his unfair it is that they're being scrutinized for corruption, I think this is really bugging them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 89 points 1 year ago (3 children)

is it SO fucking insane that we all know he's corrupt but he's still able to go to work and put on his fucking robe and ruin people's lives and we're meant to keep respecting that. fucking dogshit country

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago

The GOP spent the last 2 decades getting to an overwhelming 6-3 majority on the court. They won't risk that over something they find as superfluous as integrity.

[–] evatronic@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We are rapidly approaching a point where the SCOTUS can rule and states, or even the federal government will simply.. ignore it.

I'm not sure which party will cross that line, but we're real close. And when it happens, we almost immediately devolve into an epic shitstorm.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 84 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why are we waiting on a resignation? Kick him the fuck out.

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago

Congress can vote to kick him out, but they won't. Conservatives have been scheming and buying up anyone they could since the 80s to have a major conservative court to push their agenda: an evangelical christian based country, but only the parts that benefit them and tax cuts for the super wealthy. They didn't spend billions to never get a return on their investments.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Flip the chair over. He's like 60-something.

Use a buddy before lifting anything over 75lbs though.

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's like 60-something

He’s 75

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 80 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Dissolve the court. Arrest Gorsuch, Thomas, Alito and Kavanaugh. Bring in an independent investigator and if any of the others have so much as gotten a ride to their car from someone with business before the court arrest them too. No more "well it's only a little bit corrupt" or "yeah but you've gotta understand" or that horse shit. You want your word to be the literal law that almost 400 million people have to live under? You need to be fucking flawless.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 73 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Clarence Thomas resign

YES

calls

Oh…

Haha, that was me as well. I need to read the whole text before getting emotional 🙄

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And Clarence Thomas' response is that the American Mullahs can do whatever they like and there's fuck all anyone can do about it.

[–] Halafax@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Except stay awake while hearing cases at the country's top court. Thomas likes his naps as much as he likes his billionaire patrons.

[–] BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He won't resign because the bar to remove him is too great. Now if they prosecuted him for tax evasion, that could get him off the bench before he dies.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The case will go all the way to the Supreme Court!

[–] starkzarn@infosec.pub 13 points 1 year ago

😆 God the judiciary is fucked up...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] profdc9@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

Now that Thomas's image can not get any worse, he's just going to become more overt about trying to destroy the US government from the bench. That's all that will happen.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

clarence thomas to Americans: “fuck you, got mine”.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Requesting him to resign is the same thing as asking cancer to just… please leave.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago

Clarence hears ya.

Clarence don’t care.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I skimmed the title and saw "Clarence Thomas resigns over calls [...]" and my first thought was "I can't believe it took this long."

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Unless there are dramatic political reforms, you'll be waiting the rest of his life.

You can't shame him out of office. If he felt shame, he wouldn't have taken so many bribes in the first place.

It's why lifetime appointments to powerful positions are a stupid idea.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hoi_polloi@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Harlan Crow is such a comic book vilain name too. Maybe it makes me think of the Harlans in altered carbon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Metriximor@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

Why would he resign? Like really why would he do it. You can't force him to, his time won't run out and corpos and lobbying will never let any sort of political entity take him from his place.

Dude is there until death you can cry all you want but he's not leaving.

I will gladly be wrong about this btw but I know i probably won't.

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

he won't resign unless he is compelled by the law or court order. there are too many people who have invested in him for him to just walk away.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 19 points 1 year ago

There is literally nothing compelling him to resign and if he did resign under democrat rule, the republicans would make sure that he will never feel safe again.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only way he'll ever leave his position is feet first. Just like RBG and Scalia.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He has literally stated his life goal is to "make liberals' lives miserable" because some Catholic priest wannabes were racist to him in seminary.

Which would be cool of him if he'd like, not picked the bootlicking side. Or if he wasn't doing what those miserable dicks wanted? Or knew what a liberal was?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Can any overly-conservative and/or overly-corporate decision that was 5:4 thanks to him be recalled, too?

[–] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

Maybe a system where someone can be this openly corrupt while making decisions for a large group of people shouldn't exist?

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

That would be ethical and the right thing to do so there's no way in hell that corrupt sex pest would ever resign.

[–] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Lol over half the court was bought and put in place by right wing billionaires to push their agenda. They've spent millions to put them in power and like heck they are going to let Congress remove them. The US government is not for the people it's for the billionaire oligarchs.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

we will never have better way this show is playing out even biden does it with clarence's age and job security and the people that are to supposed to check and balance each other doing the same bs and people voting for the same people this might never change

if people really truly cared about living better there would be riots the in streets over all the current mess or lack of votes for the demopublicans

might be some propaganda article out soon to smooth this over out by your local news which is owned by the same megacorp https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McClatchy it might read out that the "insert scapegoat here" are to blame for this immorality not poor clarence and we as citizens will be back at each other's throats instead just like other times in our history all over the world

load more comments
view more: next ›