The New York Times has faced criticism for its coverage of transgender issues, with some articles echoing right-wing talking points and questioning whether being trans is acceptable. Trans advocates have expressed concerns about a lack of trans voices in reporting. While Times staff generally care about the issues, coverage does not seem to receive the same rigor as other topics. An open letter signed by over 1,200 contributors called for addressing biases, but the Times did not acknowledge it. Some staff believe leadership does not fully accept the humanity of trans people. However, public backlash is starting to make the Times reconsider its approach to trans coverage.

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago

When in doubt, assume "no" and hope you find evidence to the contrary.

[–] sculd@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately a lot of mainstream media bought into TERF talking points and started "just asking questions".

We need to fight harder for trans people and LGBTQ+ in general.

[–] RadioRat@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

One of the dumbest things about anti-trans sentiment is that it sets a roadblock on recouping productive members of society. Dude, trans* folk are really just looking to alleviate distress so they can move on with our lives.

IDK why folks are so convinced something that has no bearing on the lives of others is a fucking crime against humanity. FFS try directing your rage at actual problems.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Access denied to page. Meh.