this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
296 points (88.7% liked)

Cool Guides

4692 readers
1 users here now

Rules for Posting Guides on Our Community

1. Defining a Guide Guides are comprehensive reference materials, how-tos, or comparison tables. A guide must be well-organized both in content and layout. Information should be easily accessible without unnecessary navigation. Guides can include flowcharts, step-by-step instructions, or visual references that compare different elements side by side.

2. Infographic Guidelines Infographics are permitted if they are educational and informative. They should aim to convey complex information visually and clearly. However, infographics that primarily serve as visual essays without structured guidance will be subject to removal.

3. Grey Area Moderators may use discretion when deciding to remove posts. If in doubt, message us or use downvotes for content you find inappropriate.

4. Source Attribution If you know the original source of a guide, share it in the comments to credit the creators.

5. Diverse Content To keep our community engaging, avoid saturating the feed with similar topics. Excessive posts on a single topic may be moderated to maintain diversity.

6. Verify in Comments Always check the comments for additional insights or corrections. Moderators rely on community expertise for accuracy.

Community Guidelines

By following these rules, we can maintain a diverse and informative community. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for contributing responsibly!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] suzune@ani.social 2 points 3 months ago

It's always the same. Many people tell you how a software is not a replacement for other software. Of course it isn't, because otherwise it would be exactly the same piece of software.

Tell me a replacement for LaTeX, Postfix, zsh, vim or OpenSSH. There isn't, because these are the best from my point of view.

Instead of recommending one alternative, you sometimes need to combine them. The most powerful tools are btw combinable in a tool chain and the best are controllable from common scripting or programming languages.

[–] Aermis@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I got a 3d printer (bambu p1s per someone's recommendation here) but the bambu software allows very little in the realm of adjusting a print (size for example is mostly what I can do).

I've been heavily overwhelmed looking into a 3d software editing platform to adjust prints. I don't have the capacity to learn multiple softwares, but I heard blender does pretty poorly in creating prints with hard dimensions.

While I do like to explore the realm of figurines and characters to print, I tend to use my printer for more engineered prints, things I measure and need a replacement for, or to fill in the need of something I'm I'm constructing.

This is where Adobe got most of the positive reviews for a 3d software that's best of both worlds. Creative and engineered. While blender is heavily leaning towards creative.

[–] cadekat@pawb.social 1 points 3 months ago

FreeCAD is an option, but it's a bit of a mess. Does the job though!

[–] 8000gnat@reddthat.com 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

InDesign had those text boxes that you could link to the next text box with the little red plus, and the words would flow back and forth. It's the only thing in all of the Adobe Creative Suite that I miss! FUCK ADOBE, GIMP FOR LIFE!

[–] g5pw@feddit.it 1 points 3 months ago

Maybe Scribus (FOSS) could scratch that itch?

[–] 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago

only half of these are free software. the rest is freeware.

[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

its not. but if you cant get used to the interface there is krita.

[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It is trash. Anyone who doesn't understand why does not do graphic design professionally.

[–] 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago

It's being developed, the developers thus obviously use it. every Free software product has its use-case, even if it's not suited for professionals.

[–] 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

calling any Free software product trash is also ignoring the very point of the Free software movement. the developers donated their labor to benefit the end users and not to profit a company. I believe that this deserves a little more respect

[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago

It's trash that has had a lot of hard work put into it by dedicated developers. Unfortunately, it's still bad.

[–] PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Gimp is good. I don't know what the gimp haters are always so mad about. The buttons are in different places than in photoshop, big whoop. I have been able to do everything I've ever attempted in gimp and I do modding and game development. I just don't get it.

I will say this till the day I die: Krita is better than GIMP in basically every way and can even integrate with graphicmagick for its filters via a plugin (which comes built-in for the flatpak version). The UX is so close to photoshop to the point where it makes no sense to use GIMP and endure the suffering of its UI.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›