this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
142 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3881 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey Lemmy! Time to do some digging!

I was sent a link from a friend about some Totally Cool™ guy who has close ties to JD Vance: Curtis Yarvin. Anyone aware of this guy and his desires? I won't put the link in here as my last post was removed because of it, but a comment within the thread is copied below.

Apparently Japanese media covered the story as was posted to Reddit, but there doesn't seem to be too much talk of this in the US.

From a comment in the reddit discussion: “Curtis Yarvin is a far-right ‘intellectual’ that wants to end democracy and install what I can only really describe as cyberpunk feudalism. He’s suggested turning the United States into a patchwork of corporate fiefdoms ruled with absolute impunity by CEOs, as well as putting mandatory ankle monitors on all unemployed and poor people. This sounds like a joke, but I’m serious. JD Vance is not just a fan of him intellectually, but also a personal friend. As someone who has known about Yarvin for several years, it’s been really concerning seeing how he could potentially become a Rasputin-like figure in the event of a Trump victory. Beyond this, Yarvin has also spent many years advocating for what sounds eerily like Project 2025.”

Links within comment:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin

https://newrepublic.com/article/183971/jd-vance-weird-terrifying-techno-authoritarian-ideas

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/23373795/curtis-yarvin-neoreaction-redpill-moldbug

For those familiar with Star Citizen lore, he apparently wants to turn the US into the Stanton system “lol” …

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago

I heard of Yarvin before he was (in)famous and I'm amazed at how close he has gotten to power, given how far outside of the mainstream his ideas are.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I listened to a podcast about Vance and where he got his ideas. They said that group of people think there are 3 kinds of government: 1) democracy, 2) oligarchy. 3) monarchy.

They think democracy has failed and become an oligarchy. So their solution is to overthrow everything and put in a American monarchy.

Yup this is the one Yarvin and Vance:

Techno libertarians, white nationalists and JD Vance are all linked to a movement known as the 'New Right.' What is this movement and how has it influenced the Republican candidate for vice president?

[On Point | Podcast] JD Vance and the rise of the 'New Right' #onPointPodcast https://podcastaddict.com/on-point-podcast/episode/180222410 via @PodcastAddict

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yarvin sounds even more deranged than Trump.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 10 points 2 months ago

He's the worst kind. The kind with a fucked up vision.

Trump only has a vision of his bank account, the danger comes from his incompetence and apathy to what happens around him as far as the government goes.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 3 points 2 months ago

I think thats what trump was looking for. Someone people would want in charge less than him. Jokes on him though as its the exact things his rapid fans would want over him and they are more likely to do the deed as well.

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is terrible, and he needs to be stopped. Having said that, Rasputin was said, and this is all I could think about.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

I just started watching the History of the World Part 2 and all I can think of is Johnny Knoxville now.

[–] yemmly@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

It’s a helluva drug

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Curtis Yarvin is also adjacent to the Effective Altruism people. Got to make a yarn and thumbtack chart of the connections...

[–] tjoa@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Everytime I read some story like this I wonder at what point we are finally turning THEM into biodiesel?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 4 points 2 months ago

I kept saying something similar every time I learned more about project 2025. These people are so goddamn evil and misguided in their convictions it's an absolute mystery how we all just sit back and let it happen, myself included.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sounds like a shittier version of Snow Crash...

How do people like this exist? Why can't it just be enough to have more money than you could ever spend?

These people have an illness.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

New Republic - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for New Republic:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Vox - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Vox:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Wikipedia - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Wikipedia:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curtis_Yarvin
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/23373795/curtis-yarvin-neoreaction-redpill-moldbug
https://newrepublic.com/article/183971/jd-vance-weird-terrifying-techno-authoritarian-ideas
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support