this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
813 points (97.9% liked)

Fediverse

28494 readers
603 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Probably better to post in the github issue rather than replying here.

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4967

(page 8) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

Having seen the complete absence of mayhem on kbin caused by vote visibility, the absolute and utter nothing that will come of this decision leads me to say yeah, sure. That said, I’d prefer improved mod tools over this, but option c isn’t listed.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Generally speaking, you shouldn't do anything on the internet that you absolutely don't want to become public. If you don't want people to know your votes, don't vote.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Five@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 months ago

I support opening up vote logs to moderators in their own communities. Voting records add useful context to the nature of the exchanges happening, eg. if two people are having a back and forth, but neither is downvoting the other, it contextualizes the disagreement as less hostile.

I don't think it's a good idea to give every new user the burden of using that information responsibly. A minority would use it to retaliate, stalk, and harass, and there would be too many of them to reasonably hold them accountable.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I can't read Chinese, so I'm not sure what good seeing their names would be. A downvote is a downvote.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›