421

Ukrainian soldiers suspected they would invade Russia when they got new rifles, but still thought it was a joke when the orders came through (www.businessinsider.com)

submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

91 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Ukrainian's shock offensive on Russia's Kursk region came as a surprise even to Ukraine's soldiers.
"We joked that it wasn't April 1st," a Ukrainian soldier told The Economist.
The country's troops did suspect that an invasion was imminent after they were issued new equipment.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 133 points 2 months ago

Op Sec was fantastic from Ukraine. With that and Russia ignoring what info on troop buildup they did have, they managed operational surprise.

[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

The Russians themselves were also detected to be building up troop numbers in Southern Kursk just opposite of Sumy. The Ukrainians cleverly used that to send troops to Sumy, which the Russians must have thought that it was a countermove to defend against them, to mask their true intentions of going on the offensive. The Ukrainians merely turned the operational table on to the Russians.

That being said, with hindsight, the earlier attacks on Belgorod by anti-Putin Russians could have been probing attacks to identify weakpoints in the Russian border. Or perhaps to distract the Russians and redirect troops away from other areas. Or both. All of these are clever and creative plans by Kyiv; and they played their hands well.

[-] pelya@lemmy.world 66 points 2 months ago

Considering how the plans for the counterattack were leaked by everyone and their mom last year, this time they did the right thing with secrecy.

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 41 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Andrey Gurulyov, a Russian lawmaker and retired major general, said in a televised interview in Russia on August 8 that the country's military knew about Ukraine's plans to attack Kursk a month before it happened.

"But from the top came the order not to panic, and that those above know better," Gurulyov said, according to a translation by The New York Times.

"So we staffed it with the greenest of recruits, and left it practically defenseless!"

Lmao, I'm sure they knew. Riiiiight xD

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

All according to keikaku

[-] Laser@feddit.org 20 points 2 months ago

(Translator's note: keikaku means plan)

[-] bassad@jlai.lu 6 points 2 months ago

jokes aside it could have been the plan : leave some land and let ukraine extend logistic line.

Napoleon did burn Moscow before the catastrophic Winter retreat, Hitler almost went to Moscow during Barbarossa, at the end Russia survived

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] small44@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago

Rome did something similar against hannibal

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 73 points 2 months ago

What? Handed out new rifles? I'm sure it was very effective.

[-] small44@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

Invading the enemy to force them to retrieve from part of their land

[-] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

Next step: salt.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024

421 points (98.2% liked)

World News

38956 readers

1647 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.