this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
70 points (90.7% liked)

World News

38987 readers
2080 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A transgender woman from Australia has won a discrimination case against a women-only social media app, after she was denied access on the basis of being male.

The Federal Court found that although Roxanne Tickle had not been directly discriminated against, she was a victim of indirect discrimination - which refers to when a decision disadvantages a person with a particular attribute - and ordered the app to pay her A$10,000 ($6,700; £5,100) plus costs.

It’s a landmark ruling when it comes to gender identity, and at the very heart of the case was the ever more contentious question: what is a woman?

In 2021, Tickle downloaded “Giggle for Girls”, an app marketed as an online refuge where women could share their experiences in a safe space, and where men were not allowed.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Wait, what is this? Positive news coming from Australia?? Is the world about to end? I'm scared.

[–] Twinkletoes@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What even is a woman?! Aren’t we all just humans? What does it all mean?! 🤯

[–] eatthecake@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

A woman is drinking coffee.

[–] stoicmaverick@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

What is a celt?

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Wouldn't this apply to dating sites/apps in the same way too?

Dating is literally discrimination, you are picking a partner by discriminating.

Would this ruling not mean you can't filter out (either by registration or search) people with certain traits?

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 months ago

I'd think no. This is barring someone from using an app entirely. But when it comes to dating, everyone has a preference of gender, even if that preference is "no preference".

And dating isn't discrimination. It's picking a person that you want to spend extra, and frequently intimate, time with. It's a billion subconscious factors that your brain interprets as love, affection, or whatever other emotion your brain wants. Can some of those factors be discriminatory? Sure.

I like men and women and everything in-between and around, and I'm sure I have plenty of biases and discriminations of my own, but that's not enough to outright call all dating discrimination

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I think you asked a good question, but I also think the answer is no. As I understand this situation, the platform in this case did the discrimination. So in a dating app the user simply specified preferences on an individual basis. It might mean that certain selectors become an issue.. can you offer a racial filter???.. But this is for another lawsuit I guess.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

BBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for BBC News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c07ev1v7r4po
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support