100
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 44 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They tried to replace him one time and the fans lost their shit, leading to a reversal. I remember the outrage, apparently he wasn't even contacted for the role in Hitman Absolution and had no idea he wouldn't be voicing it until the trailer came out for it with a different voice actor.

Fans tweeted at him asking why he wouldn't be doing the voice this time around and he was just like "I have no idea guys, nobody has spoken to me about it at all."

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

It's funny, because up until that point, I thought his performance was wholly replaceable; in the first game, I'd call it outright bad. It wasn't until Absolution that I felt like I saw him really acting for the first time.

[-] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Is it the same guy? Or do they just keep cloning and reprinting him?

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

I hate recasting characters, replacing narrators in the middle of an audiobook series, etc. It's super jarring, and it feels bad even if the replacement does a really good job.

There have been cases where it's been for the better, cases where someone died and there's no way around it, etc, and cases where I still kind of wish they didn't do it, but it works OK. But there should be an extremely strong preference to avoid doing so unless there's actually no alternative.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

I disagree. Look at the time Justin Roiland was accused of false imprisonment, and they replaced Rick and Morty. It went great, the new Rick and Morty sound perfect. Now look at how Marvel dragged their feet on replacing Jonathan Majors and eventually decided to just ignore all their Kang foreshadowing and replace him with Dr Doom. It sucks, they should have just recast him.

Recasting allows newer and less well known actors to break into an entertainment industry dominated by sequels, adaptations, and franchises. They reduce the capital held by big time actors who are already far too rich. Recasting is good.

[-] magikmw@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

It's even more hilariously bad because they recast a veteran series actor in a new role. Until retirement and beyond!

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
100 points (97.2% liked)

Games

16679 readers
906 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS