86
submitted 1 month ago by Sunny@slrpnk.net to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

This seems like a solid choice for those of use looking for a obsidian-like replacement. Personally tried all editors out there, but nothing is able to defeat my love for obsidian. However, i look forwards to trying out Haptic when it comes to Linux. Currently it only supports Web and Mac. But state Linux and Windows support is on-the-way.

Kudos to selfh.st that provides consistent updates within this community and who shared this among other cool projects this week -> https://selfh.st/newsletter/2024-09-06/?ref=this-week-in-self-hosted-newsletter

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Lol can't even open the "web-app" wiki https://app.haptic.md/notes on my phone

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

Ew. They don't even try to load lol.

[-] geography082@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I tried every single proprietary and open source , even self host , markdown notes apps. Obsidian is … just, i always go back to it. I have it with the plugin “Remotely Save”, synced encrypted with OneDrive. It just works, every fucking where with its own app. solid as a petrified dump

[-] Guenther_Amanita@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

I don't see any problems with that. Even I (and probably most others here), who are FOSS advocates, think Obsidian's model is fine.

The devs surely get why FOSS is important, and try their best to match the pros of open source. They even stated that if the company goes bankrupt or they stop developing the app, they'll open source it.

One major thing they do absolutely right is how the notes get stored. On other note taking apps, it's a proprietary database, often "in the cloud", where your notes get hold hostage. Here, they're just Markdown files, and the whole thing is pretty open, encouraging a strong community.

It's similar to Valve/ Steam. Proprietary, but liked by most Linux people.

[-] Elkenders@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

I'm early onto my journey with this and tossing between logseq and obsidian. Thoughts?

[-] Guenther_Amanita@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

Logseq and Obsidian are only similar on the first look, but very different usage wise. Both are very open with a plugin system, and you can modify them to turn them into one eachother.

So, if you want only FOSS, then Logseq is the only choices you have.

But Obsidian is, even though it's proprietary, very sane. Open plug-in system, active community, great devs who don't have much against FOSS, and more.


Obsidian

  • More similar to a classic note taking app, like OneNote, but with a lot of features. Hierarchical structure, and more of an "essay" style, where you store a lot of text in one page.
  • Page linking is only done when you think it makes sense
  • Has been a bit longer around than Logseq, feels more polished
  • Great sync and mobile app, which support plugins from what I've heard

Logseq

  • Non-linear outliner. Every page is on the same level, but within a text passage, the indentation matters (parent-child-relationship)
  • You create a LOT of more pages. Most of my pages are empty. They are mainly there for linking topics. I rarely create pages manually.
  • The journal is where you write most stuff. You then link each block to a page.
  • Logseq a bit "special". May not be for everyone. I for example am a bit of a disorganised thinker, who mentally links a lot of knowledge and throws concepts around all the time. Logseq is my second nature, because it's more flexible. My GF on the other hand is more structured, and prefers something like Apple Notes, or, if she would care about note taking, something like Obsidian.
  • The mobile app isn't great. It's fine when I'm not at home, but the desktop version is the "proper" one, and mobile/ iPad a second class citizen.
  • Sync is only experimental for now. It will soon be officially supported (hopefully) and self hostable, but it worked fine for me.
[-] Elkenders@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

This is really helpful, thank you. I've made a start with Logseq but I think I'll try Obsidian and migrate my notes across. I'm definitely a structured guy.

[-] u_tamtam@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

You need to list out your requirements. What do you want to do? Where do you need your data? Do you care about open source? Self-hosting? Do you have an idea how your content will be organized? Will you ever need to tap into it as data? Etc

[-] Elkenders@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

I have notes fairly sporadically all over the place. Some for work for compartmentalised projects that I won't need to see again once the project is done. Then for personal creative projects. Then for personal research projects. I like tracking data for sure. I'd prefer to have one central place for everything. I like things organised and get very into organisation but I'd love some kind of AI organisation element. Not sure either of these do that though. I do have my own server and like self hosting. I do care about foss but will sometimes choose a more appropriate tool over a foss one. I need the data on my phone and accessible either on a cloud or syncable or something. I'm currently dipping my toe into Obsidian with syncthing/Dropbox. I won't pay for any monthly fees but don't mind paying one off payments.

[-] u_tamtam@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

I think you should give Trilium(Next) Notes a try:

  • it has the hierarchical notes structure that you are familiar with in obsidian

  • it has better ways of keeping things organized (attributes can be values or references, can be shared and inherited, which provides a flexible framework for having notes "types" as templates that can be extended, e.g. people vs. colleagues, businesses vs. companies, etc)

  • it has the concept of note hoisting (which lets you focus on a note and its sub-notes, so other projects/spaces don't come in the way of autocomplete and placing references), and workspaces that builds further on top of that

  • it can be used standalone (local client/offline-only, like obsidian) but coupling it with a remote-server opens more interesting use-cases (synching, sharing notes with others by public URLs, one-user/multi-client editing) which gives the best of both worlds (local-first/online-first) and lets you access your personal notes on devices you don't necessarily own (which obsidian doesn't). The mobile app story isn't great (it's a PWA with limited offline capabilities at the moment), but isn't worse than the alternatives either (I can't really work and think long form on a handheld, no matter the editor experience, but perhaps that's just me).

[-] Elkenders@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

Iiiinteresting, I'll give it a spin, thank you for the recco!

[-] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Obsidian is just sooooo good. I hate that you (technically 😉) have to pay for multi device sync, but the UI and UX are excellent, especially if you're already proficient in markdown

Haven't tried logseq before, so I can't compare

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

I have my workspace in Google drive synced folder and it's worked fine.

[-] papertowels@lemmy.one 1 points 1 month ago

How else do you get multi device sync?

My current solution is to use syncthing to handle syncing the files, but I have to debug a permissions error that pops up.

[-] Lem453@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

See me comment above

https://lemmy.ca/comment/11490137

I don't like that obsidian not fully open source but the plugins can't be beat if you use them. Check out some youtube videos for top 20 plugins etc. Takes the app to a whole new level.

[-] Sunny@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

I feel ya on this one... its magically good.

[-] u_tamtam@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Have you tried trilium notes? Not as hyped and polished, but does extraordinarily well IME.

[-] thejevans@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

As soon as one of these Obsidian alternatives has real-time collaboration and a mobile interface, I'm ready to switch.

[-] Lem453@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

The real power of obsidian is similar to why Raspberry Pi is so popular, it has such a large community that plugins are amazing and hard to duplicate.

That being said, I use this to live sync between all my devices. It works with almost the same latency as google docs but its not meant for multiple people editing the same file at the same time

https://github.com/vrtmrz/obsidian-livesync

[-] thejevans@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I need something to collaborate with my partner in realtime. We've got a hacky setup in Obsidian using dataview to join separate notes to a read-only one, so we don't have collisions, but I would love something better.

[-] WeAreAllOne@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago
[-] B0rax@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago

Syncthing works on a file level basis. If files are changed on both devices at the same time, it will have sync conflicts.

[-] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The comment two above this links to a tool that literally does live syncing on a line by line level. Unless you're editing the same lines at the same time you're not going to get sync conflicts.

I use it as well and it works wonderfully in real time.

[-] B0rax@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

I wouldn’t know. All I am saying is that Syncthing would not work for this purpose.

[-] barcaxavi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Can confirm, seen it live. As soon as LogSeq was open on both devices it threw an error.

[-] halm@leminal.space 6 points 1 month ago

local-first

web app

I'm confused, which is it?

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago

It's a web app wrapped in Tauri. So basically a desktop app, but the web app can be hosted too.

[-] halm@leminal.space 4 points 1 month ago

Gotcha! Thanks for the ELI5 🙂

[-] Dirk@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

You host it locally and use a web browser to access it.

[-] mfortini@feddit.it 5 points 1 month ago

How does it compare to logseq? It's been my obsidian replacement

[-] Lodra@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

If you'd like to learn more about Haptic, why it's being built, what its goals are and how it differs from all the other markdown editors out there, you can read more about it here.

As others have noted, the app doesn’t work on mobile yet. Anybody willing to share the content here for mobile users?

[-] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Why Haptic

We built Haptic to make markdown writing simpler and more accessible. We believe that many existing editors are too complex for simple use cases and day-to-day note writing, so we decided to fix that.

What Makes Haptic Special

  1. Ready to Use: Open Haptic and start writing. No setup needed.

  2. Simple Design: Clean interface so you can focus on your writing.

  3. Write Anywhere: Use Haptic on any computer with internet. Great for public or work computers where you can't download software.

  4. Made for Everyone: If other editors feel overwhelming, you'll like Haptic.

  5. Open Source: Self-host your own instance, giving you full control over your setup.


Haptic is all about making writing easier. We've left out extra features to keep things simple and help you get your ideas down without fuss.

Note: If you're looking for a markdown editor with plugin systems, complex setups, or feature-packed interfaces, Haptic might not be for you. But if you want something straightforward that just works, give Haptic a try!

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

What advantages would this have over Obsidian, which is already all local unless you explicitly make it not so?

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

My dream is something that can take a stack of markdown files with relative links and generate a static site from them. This is embarrassingly difficult. Right now I think that the GitHub Pages Ruby Gem is the best way but it has too many assumptions about being in a GitHub repository to work. Vanilla Jekyll is nice but I don't want to deal with a bunch of configs to get the experience I want.

[-] xcjs@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

It would be extremely barebones, but you can do something like this with Pandoc.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

I think I looked into this before and it lacked a feature, but I don't remember what it was. I might be getting it mixed up with another tool. There were a lot of tools that almost worked but were focused on making books with ordered pages rather than a tree. I think gitbook was one.

For folks interested in following in my footsteps, eleventy didn't fit because it couldn't convert relative links to markdown files to relative HTML links to the HTML files (out of the box, probably possible with plugins).

This just feels like such an obvious thing there would be a tool for but I can't find one. Even most editors that render Markdown as a preview can do this out of the box.

[-] vegetaaaaaaa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I do this with https://www.sphinx-doc.org/ + a basic Makefile and config file to make it a bit nicer. I will publish my template a bit later and report back.

[-] GoMati@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Super interesting, I have my fingers crossed for this one.

Probably gonna give it a go in two-three weeks ;-)

[-] u_tamtam@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

I didn't like obsidian's lacking in attributes structuring/typing and the fact that it cannot serve over a web UI (for wherever you cannot install the heavy client or just to share notes via URL), and found trilium notes to be doing that perfectly, and much much more. Highly recommend.

[-] StructureOfChaos@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago

This looks cool, but can't beat Joplin. Accessing securely my notes on multiple devices I synced on my Nextcloud is priceless.

[-] muix@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago
[-] StructureOfChaos@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago

AFAIK, only Joplin offers sync with NextCloud.

On mobile, sync works well, even with 2FA. But my access model is simple: 1/ create and edit notes on Desktop app 2/ read notes on Desktop and Mobile apps.

[-] Lem453@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

I could never get NextCloud on android to sync files back to the servers

[-] WeAreAllOne@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Also tried that but ended up using syncthing. Works fine.

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
86 points (94.8% liked)

Selfhosted

39905 readers
319 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS