239
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] simple@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

But for real though, they had to know that having telemetry be on by default wasn't going to look good for the open source community.

[-] DishonestBirb@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Especially with Red Hat's current shenanigans that just recently happened. I can't see how anyone thought this was a good idea OR good timing for it.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Fedora is separate from Redhat for the most part. It has its own board that makes decisions

[-] FalseDiamond@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Which is made of mostly RH people.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

OK your not entirely wrong but there are also community elections

[-] DishonestBirb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The discussion thread for Fedora specifically stated that the change was requested by Red Hat, as well.

[-] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Power corrupts. Let this be a lesson in letting corporations get a foothold in open source.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

Its literally opt in

[-] erik1984@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's too harsh imho (the power corrupts thing). Telemetry can be very useful (see how Mozilla lately solved a bug in Firefox related to a specific version of the Linux kernel) so I'm willing to believe their intentions were right. But I agree it's not a smart move and better to have made it opt-in taking the target audience of the distro into account.

[-] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 year ago

Can we all just pretend Red Hat and its derivatives/relatives no longer exist? It's clear that the leadership behind these projects don't care about open source anymore. There are plenty of options for Linux operating systems that actually care about user freedom, privacy, and openness. Anything with Red Hat backing it no longer gets to claim they support any of these.

Install Debian, install Arch. If you must, install Ubuntu (though they're not much better these days). Anything but Red Hat.

[-] hib@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 year ago

Don't forget SUSE :D

Everyone always forgets SUSE :(

[-] d3Xt3r@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

SuSE needs a better package manager. Zypper was cool back in the day, but no longer cuts it, especially when you compare it to the likes of dnf5.

[-] hib@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

Totally disagree, but that's a given when it comes to package managers I think. I showed my coworker who was RHEL to the core some neat Zypper features and he was pretty impressed. One feature I think is cool that I don't think anyone else has is zypper ps which shows processes with open file handles to files that were updated. I also really like the way it handles conflict resolution and the same package in multiple repos.

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

RHEL is the core IT/SysAdmin crowd. Anyone looking to get into this career space gets a copy of The Linux Bible and runs Fedora to get started. A lot of the Linux core functionality comes from, and is maintained by RH. This is not just a desktop choice for users. If you really want to get to a kernel hacking type of understanding of Linux RHEL documentation is a great baseline where there is info that does not exist in any other source except reading the source code.

[-] haroldstork@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Don’t you think that’s a bit extreme? I don’t think that the community debating opt-out telemetry qualifies fedora as not supporting open source. Correct me if I’m wrong, but Fedora is a community run project, meaning basically all of it has to be open source.

[-] curve@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

There's so much dumb fud spread about fedora and RHEL anymore it's not worth the time arguing about it.

[-] haroldstork@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I am also very tired of debating it too. It seems like these people are more content with being angry about it than understanding the move and disagreeing with it

[-] KingKRool@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's exhausting, and shit like this is truly one of the most toxic aspects of the FOSS community.

[-] anonymous_bot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Lets say I wanted a distro with more bleeding edge packages but not something DIY like Arch, what would you recommend?

[-] RainRaining@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Nowadays I use EndeavourOS. It's Arch bit "just works" Graphical installer, you choose a DE, it automatically installs audio, media codecs etc. But under the hood it's still Arch so you get daily updates and AUR

[-] CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I use Calam Arch Installer which is a graphical installer not unlike those used on other distros but for vanilla Arch. Garuda and Manjaro use the same installer but with their tweaks. Calam installer is standard Arch.

[-] Falmarri@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't really can arch diy. I run arch. I have way fewer problems with it than any other distro

[-] Paralda@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

CachyOS. It's arch based, but the installer is really good, and it has great repos. It also has a lot of optimizations for modern cpus

[-] gk99@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Alright, let's say I'm a Windows user who wants to dual-boot Linux and was planning on Fedora because I've heard it's pretty good for someone transferring over from that OS, but this telemetry bullshit has turned me away.

What would you say is next best?

[-] bhamlin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Honestly, Ubuntu would be a good place to start learning. Then once you're feeling brave, Debian. Then once you're really feeling cocky, Arch will happily take you down a few pegs.

[-] Presi300@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You cannot say that the derivatives of RHEL don't support foss, as all of them are community made/maintained. Also TECHNICALLY speaking RedHat did not breach the GPL, as it allows for selling of foss projects... Not saying that it's not a dick move, just saying that it's TECHNICALLY legal...

[-] Aggravationstation@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Yea, OK. I was a Red Hat apologist and kept using Fedora for a while but after this sadly I think it's time to go back to Debian. Thank God I didn't install Fedora on my new server which I was going to set up next weekend.

[-] AnonymousLlama@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Actually out of the loop for this one. What's the deal with making that on by default, was there any justification?

[-] KingKRool@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

They haven't made anything. It's just a proposal right now. Instead of constructively sharing feedback about the default state, people are spouting hyperbole like "Red Hat is Windows".

[-] itsJoelleScott@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, thank you for explaining. I don't follow Linux news as closely as I should, and I wondered if this affects me because I use Fedora.

[-] moonsnotreal@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Honestly I don't care about the proposal. If it's just a checkbox to untick on install then it's not much different from what apps like vlc do.

[-] Maximilious@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago

Guess it's time to migrate my VM servers to a different distro entirely.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
239 points (98.0% liked)

linuxmemes

20762 readers
1655 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS