this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
28 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

1340 readers
169 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Americans used just over 100 trillion megabytes of wireless data in 2023, up 36% over the prior year in the largest single-year increase in wireless data consumption, according to an industry survey released on Tuesday.

Survey: https://api.ctia.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/2024-Annual-Survey-1.pdf

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Why does the headline & story use megabytes for this? Especially in a report about 2023.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's the measurements survey used. Survey: https://api.ctia.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/2024-Annual-Survey-1.pdf

Added to the body post.

[–] Skydancer@pawb.social 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Americans used just over 100 ~~trillion megabytes~~ exabytes of wireless data in 2023

Megabytes are absolutely the wrong unit for this amount of data.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

nobody knows what an exabyte is so why would anybody use that?

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

We live in a world where finding out what an exabyte is takes all of 3 seconds. You really want to argue the standard for communication of information should be based on the most ignorant and unmotivated people?

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

looks like you answered your own question there bud

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I don't know... I can't answer what you're trying to argue. That's your hill to defend if you want to.

[–] scholar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How about billion Gigabytes, or million Terabytes?

[–] Mac@mander.xyz -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

at that point what's the difference?

[–] scholar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are smaller, more familliar numbers paired with more appropriate units that people have heard of

[–] Mac@mander.xyz -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I guarantee you that most people still don't know what a terabyte is. gigabytes, probably...

anyway all I'm saying is that a headlines goal is to reach and be understood by as many people as possible so obviously they're not going to use something that nobody knows, like exa, peta, and terabytes.
I think most people have a general feeling for how much a megabyte is because most of the things that we deal with are sized in megabytes.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But a hell of a lot more people will know what a gigabyte is compared to an exabyte, even I had to think for a few seconds to figure out what scale exabyte was compared to what I know, and I work with computer hardware everyday.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Strykker@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

I misread and thought you said people wouldn't know gigabytes, I disagree that people won't know Tera bytes especially since most laptops seem to ship with at least 1TB drives these days.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

Ditch exabytes, return to bytes

[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

100EB that's the one after PB, good to know that the government can store it all as ZFS supports files that large

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Honestly the sad part is that you aren't wrong

[–] kowcop@aussie.zone 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How many Danny DeVitos is that?

[–] zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In what resolution? Lossy or lossless compression?

[–] BatrickPateman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Before or after offering us an egg in these trying times?

[–] Zoop@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

Not enough, I can tell you that! We need more Danny Devitos.

[–] afk_strats@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Can I have that in football fields worth of Bill Gates's paper stacks? Pic for context

1000003435

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

He was hoarding all the toilet paper in the corona supermarket wars. New conspiracy unlocked. /s

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

That feels like a bad comparison. Technically paper could told a huge amount of data if you write small enough

[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

1.618x10^7 at a height of bill gates

About 14 football fields, stacked up to the crossbar.
according to GPT-4o-mini that I haven't double-checked, which means it's likely wrong somewhere.

Summary of Paper Volume and Football Fields

Data Capacity of a Letter-Sized Page

  • Dimensions: 8.5 x 11 inches
  • Average Text Capacity:
    • Approximately 500 to 600 words
    • About 2,500 to 3,000 characters
    • Roughly 2,500 to 3,000 bytes (using standard ASCII/UTF-8)

Total Pages for 100 Exabytes

  • 100 Exabytes = 10^20 bytes
  • Average Bytes per Page: 2,750 bytes
  • Total Pages: Approximately 36.4 trillion pages

Volume of the Paper

  • Volume of One Page:
    • Volume = 8.5 inches x 11 inches x 0.004 inches ≈ 0.000374 cubic inches
  • Total Volume for 36.4 Trillion Pages:
    • Total volume ≈ 7.89 million cubic feet

Volume of a Football Field

  • Dimensions:
    • Length: 120 yards (360 feet)
    • Width: 53.3 yards (160 feet)
    • Height: 10 feet
  • Volume: Approximately 576,000 cubic feet

Football Fields Needed to Hold the Paper

  • Calculation:
    • Number of football fields ≈ 7,890,000 cubic feet / 576,000 cubic feet ≈ 14
  • Result: Approximately 14 football