this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
149 points (96.9% liked)

Firefox

17902 readers
27 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] neurospice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 months ago

about:about to list all the about pages

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Looks like it might only be in the newest version or in Firefox for desktop because when I tried it in Fennec it didnt work

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

It's desktop only, and from 2008.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

It doesn't work on the latest Firefox Beta, so it's probably just for the desktop app.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Interested in more Easter eggs? Type in about:mozilla in the address bar and you can read The Book of Mozilla.

[–] sovietknuckles@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

Or go to moz://a to

spoilerread the manifesto

[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] SacralPlexus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He’s not a robot though, right? I though replicants were genetically engineered humans?

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Nah the second movie was kind of awful in that it just threw that and other things out for no good reason. The original source book by Philip K Dick ("Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?") is explicit that they are androids.

In my opinion it was not a sequel in the proper sense but more something cribbing a recognizable name to sell movie tickets with vaguely related ideas, themes, setting, and Harrison Ford who will do any movie for lots of money as long as he doesn't have to put any effort in.

And they were kind of able to do this because Ridley Scott decided to not use the term android in the film adaptation because he wanted something different sounding and so chose the term replicant instead which doesn't have the clear connotations that android does but Ridley Scott did pretty clearly intend for them to be androids whereas the sequel threw that and the entire context and larger meaning of the work out in favor of whatever it was they were doing.

[–] SacralPlexus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

TIL, thanks for the explanation!

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 months ago

why I prefer firefox over chrome/edge / other chromium forks

[–] tisktisk@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 2 months ago

Easter egg and a little fun. Been there for decades.

[–] ToffeeIsForClosers@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just the concept of a plan?

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 months ago

Cylons leave nothing to chance.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What are the last 2 referencing?

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago

First: Asimov’s three laws

Second: Ned Beatty speech from Blade Runner

Third: Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy has a reference to the Sirius cybernetics company whose marketing division has coined that phrase for their robots.

Fourth: Bender from Futurama’s catchphrase “bite my shiny metal ass”

[–] Wolfwood1@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

The last one "And they have a plan" is from Battlestar Galactica