this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
227 points (98.3% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2552 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Although modern technology, including drones and electronic warfare, has shaped the Russia-Ukraine war, the outcome will likely depend on which side can sustain its artillery usage.

Both countries rely heavily on Soviet doctrine that emphasizes artillery, with Russia firing around 10,000 rounds daily and Ukraine about 2,000. Initially, Ukraine relied on its Soviet-era stockpiles of 152mm artillery and ammunition, supplemented by NATO-provided 155mm systems and shells.

Moving forward, Ukraine is in an increasingly stronger position, now having the capability to produce both 155mm howitzers and the corresponding artillery shells.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ironsoap@lemmy.one 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes... But what rate are they producing? Bloody article.

Guessing it's lower then the 2000 shot daily. I know the US is ramping up it's own production of 155.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Regardless how this horror ends, they’ll have to figure out how to rebuild, and producing shells “to nato standards” might be a good thing there too, to increase international trade

[–] ironsoap@lemmy.one 3 points 1 month ago

As I said in the other comment, PreRun mentioned the same. It's actually impressive to see how well Ukraine has adapted to EU/NATO/Western standards whilst in a war. More ways Ukraine is winning this, or at least staying afloat.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's not the article's fault. I'm almost certain Ukraine is going to keep those numbers close to the chest for OPSEC.

[–] ironsoap@lemmy.one 3 points 1 month ago

Indeed, PreRun said similar in his most recent video about Ukraine's War Economy. Still, percentages or some indication of how close they are to being capable would make me feel less frustrated with the situation.