this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
135 points (91.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

62732 readers
337 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I saw some threads here about Telegram and piracy stuff being banned. So, as an experimental alternative, I created a public Signal group for piracy.

Maybe it'll be useful?

Before joining

Signal supports usernames and hiding telephone numbers. Here's a blog entry on how to do so. You might want to:

  • set a username
  • change your profile name (these are two separate things!)
  • hide your phone number
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Untold1707@lemm.ee 57 points 9 months ago (5 children)

You might try a Matrix group instead. Doesn’t require a phone number and supports more than 1000 users unlike Signal. Search is bad though unfortunately.

[–] amaki@jlai.lu 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why not use SimpleX Chat? If you use Matrix for that you will likely get reported and get banned

[–] blicante@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 9 months ago

Go ahead and create the group then make a post. Nobody's holding you back my friend.

[–] darkstar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

Some suggest matrix, others simplex. Not sure which one would be better honestly

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wistful@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What is even the point of "piracy groups"? What exactly can you find there that you cannot in other places designed for that, e.g., trackers, usenet, forums...?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] liveinthisworld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Good idea overall, unfortunately they still have your IP and phone number which means Europeans are still implicated

[–] blicante@moist.catsweat.com 40 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Signal doesn't collect IPs and therefore can't even hand them out. It's been requested in 2021. Here's a list of requests from authorities they were allowed to publish. I've looked through 3 of the most recent and nowhere do they reveal IPs.

[–] liveinthisworld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Sure they don't log the IPs, but it is technically impossible to not know the IP when you're running a centralized service.

[–] lol@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 9 months ago (2 children)

IIRC, because of sealed sender, they can't know who you're communicating with, only that you're using Signal at all.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago

I wrote a comment here about why sealed sender does not achieve what it purports to.

[–] liveinthisworld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago

I didn't know that. Thanks

[–] blicante@moist.catsweat.com 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

What are the "popular" alternatives? Telegram stores everything, WhatsApp doesn't allow usernames, Matrix requires IPs too...

[–] liveinthisworld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago

TBH I would just use email over TOR and encrypt communication with PGP. Rotate identities every now and then and you should be fine. Yes it doesn't have forward secrecy but it removes the effort to find the "right messaging" service and is instead ubiquitous (and you can sign up for anonymous email addresses online too, which makes it even better).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uiiiq@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The phone number is not connected to the messages. That’s the only thing they have. It is the best app for privacy.

[–] liveinthisworld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Arguable in it being "the best app for privacy". Can you link to a source which shows that phone numbers are not linked to accounts? (Why do they need them anyway?)

[–] uiiiq@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They have published requests from the law enforcement and their responses to these requests. The only unencrypted data they have is the phone number, a date of sign up and a date of the last login. That is it, everything else is encrypted and they cannot access it whatsoever.

[–] liveinthisworld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago (14 children)

The problem is, if you're in Europe, your phone number is associated with your identity

[–] uiiiq@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So what? The law enforcement knows you have an account and knows the sign up date and last login. That doesn’t affect your privacy whatsoever. Besides, Europe isn’t a monolith. You can absolutely buy and use a SIM card without disclosing your name in some countries.

[–] ladfrombrad@lemdro.id 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

No you don't.

I can go to the corner shop/local garage right now, buy a SIM card for 99p and then buy a top-up voucher in cash to have a completely anonymous phone number.

Albeit is the UK in Europe again? 🙈

edit: where I would be worried if my privacy was on the line is I could also go to the local pawn shop / Cash Converters to ensure that SIM card isn't associated with an IMEI I've previously used and buy in cash a cheapo phone.

[–] blicante@moist.catsweat.com 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Same in a few other European countries. I'm doing it right now with a few SIMs. You can also go on holiday to another country, get a few temporary SIMs there for a few quid and fly back home with the "contraband". Really not hard.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

But, again, all they can prove is that you signed up to Signal and when you last signed in.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] geography082@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] cyclicircuit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 months ago

Is there a simplex group we can join?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Will a simplex group better? Nothing identifiable.

[–] blicante@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Make it and share it. I don't have simplex.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ancoraunamoka@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, let's talk piracy behind some stupid walled garden. As if public conversations are not fragmented enough as it is

[–] blicante@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Signal is a walled garden?

[–] ancoraunamoka@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

how is it not?

  • the worst kind of opensource, where you are not allowed to run the software yourself (or even fork it)
  • not indexable
  • requires signup with personal informations
  • forever tied to a single identity
  • not exportable to other services
  • no open formats for its storage

it's a shitty service, by a shitty person. I know Moxie personally, and he is basically Elon Musk if he didn't make it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lemmus@szmer.info 4 points 9 months ago (9 children)

The problem is Signal supports up to 1000 people group chat, so it's better to find something different

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago

I can barely handle chat groups with 100 ppl.

[–] SomeOne@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] hurtn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago

Thanks for doing this

[–] GlenRambo@jlai.lu 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Tracker Control is blocking me from joining. Weird that Molly (its a hardened signal fork) is showing amazon is being contacted when trying to join the group.

I can unblock it but its weird. I also noticed the other domains its been trying to (unsuccessfully) contact.

[–] powermaker450@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Unmapped@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

I think signal servers may be using aws hosting.

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 3 points 9 months ago

Signal uses Amazon's servers, look it up. It's all encrypted of course.

load more comments
view more: next ›