this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
23 points (92.6% liked)

Technology

1366 readers
1852 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Valve previously sued a law firm in attempt to stop mass arbitration claims.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] czech@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A law firm was trying to extort Valve with 75k arbitration claims which would cost $3k per claim ($225mm total). As an alternative they offered to settle for $2.9k per claimant.

In the 5 years since the binding arbitration was introduced valve has had only 3 arbitration cases and won all three.

Summarized from the article.

[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks for sharing that info - I was just going off the recent headlines

To your second point, don't companies normally win arbitration cases? I thought that was the whole point of it all - to make it easier for a company to win lawsuits

[–] czech@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yea, it looks like the win rate for consumers in arbitration is less than 1%. I'm not sure what consumers win rate is in court but it must be better than that.

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

If it wasn't better than that, no company would want arbitration cases.