651
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] How_do_I_computah@lemmy.world 136 points 2 weeks ago

Didn't see what community I was in when I read the post and thought there were just a lot of people here who hate stand up comedians doing crowd work

[-] cobysev@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I thought it was referring to "standup meetings," which is what we called weekly meetings with the commander in the military.

Everyone stands for the commander when he enters a room, then each person presenting needs to be standing while briefing the commander.

It's military protocol for a high-ranking officer, although the cool officers would tell everyone to buck protocol, remain seated, and just give them the bullet points so we can get back to work.

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 11 points 2 weeks ago

I hate crowd work. Getting called on while on a night out is my worst nightmare

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 98 points 2 weeks ago

The purpose of stand up is to not listen to anything and say a sentence that no one listens to. It's like a Buddhist meditation.

[-] hannesh93@feddit.org 27 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah - it's an art to find the perfect mix between "sounds complicated enough that they zone out", "sounds like stuff gets done" and "not making people ask if you need help with that".

[-] frezik@midwest.social 10 points 2 weeks ago

Lemmy keeps it real.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 76 points 2 weeks ago

If this actually rings true, there's something pretty wrong in your team.

Stand up should be a quick and uncontroversial meeting talking about what you've done, what you'll do and anything you need help with, plus maybe a couple of minutes of small talk before you start.

[-] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 34 points 2 weeks ago

You mean you're not actually supposed to spend 2 hours daily unfucking everyone's shit during the standup turn by turn?

[-] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago

We waste the two hours doing code reviews that only three people actually need to be present for, I always appreciate the chance to zone out and do something else for a big part of the day. Follow that with lunch and I've just done half a day's work by watching TV

[-] BleatingZombie@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

My team does this for the first ~15 minutes and then we move to "group think" for any tough problems or "water cooler chat" for the remaining 15. You're allowed to leave if it's just water cooler chat, so I really like it

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 22 points 2 weeks ago

That sounds about 25 mins longer than i'm willing to call a standup.

if it's not wrapped up within 10 mins of the scheduled start time something has gone horribly wrong

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Problem is in practice, I suspect something is pretty wrong in most teams.

Some common examples come to my mind:

  • Management hears "talk about what you've done and what you will do" so great time to sit in and take notes for performance review, and it becomes a "make sure management knows you spent all your time and did really impressive stuff" meeting. Also throws a kink in "things I need help with" as there's always the risk that management decides you aren't self sufficient enough if they hear you got stuck, so you also need to defend why you got stuck and how it isn't your fault.
  • The people who feel like everyone needs to know the minutia of their trials and tribulations including all the intermediate dead ends they went down on the way to their final result. Related to the above, but there are people who think to do this even without the need to impress management.
  • The people who cannot stand to "take it offline" and will stop everything to fully work a problem while everyone is still ostensibly supposed to stay in the meeting despite having nothing to do with the two people talking (sometimes even just one, a guy starts talking to himself as he tries to do something live).
  • Groups that are organized but have very little common ground. An "everything must be scrum" company sticks a guy who does stuff like shipping and receiving into a development team and there's no 'scrum-like' interaction to be had and yet, there he is wasting his time and having to talk about stuff no one else on that meeting has a need to hear either.
[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 55 points 2 weeks ago

My dumb ass: " Wtf how often do you have to go to comedy stand ups for it to be self care NOT to go. SMH."

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Once, if it's Ricky Gervais

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago

Hm. Might not be standup that’s the problem. Might be a company culture thing. But only you know that for sure. Good luck op! Disassociation can be a life saver.

[-] degen@midwest.social 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah but then I'm up and sitting there like "oh shit, what the hell did I do yesterday?"

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

Stand ups (as originally described) shouldn't be about what you already did, but what you are going to be working on and if there is a need to collaborate.

Most people got the concept wrong and turned them into mini status meetings.

[-] Tanoh@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Yepp, and no one really listens to the others, just trying to remember what you did and make sure no one dumps more work on you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SwordInStone@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] savvywolf@pawb.social 27 points 1 week ago

Counterpoint: If you're working from home it might be the only people contact you get for days.

Supposedly talking to people and touching grass is healthy.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] HStone32@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

the more i learn about software development, the more i feel I've dodged a bullet by changing my major to electrical engineering.

[-] dalakkin@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

Well, if you learn about software development from reddit and Lemmy, that's one thing. Not always representative of the real world.

[-] HStone32@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

its the things I hear from real software developers that concern me:

  • You will spend your entire career chasing trends.
  • The market is volatile. People are constantly getting abruptly laid off. SD has never been very stable, so you should plan on getting a new job every few years.
  • Software companies are constantly looking for ways to make SD easier. As a result, your value will decrease over time, in preference for bootcampers and 2 year degree graduates.
  • Nobody listens to developers. Your manager's beliefs about SD come entirely from consultants, magazines, and Elon Musk tweets.
  • Nobody cares about quality software. If you take the time to make your code efficient and lightweight, all your manager sees is you taking longer to make something than your peers. After all, we can just raise hardware requirements if the software is slow.
[-] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
  • You will spend your entire career chasing trends.

Depends on the language, that's mostly a JavaScript/typescript issue.

  • The market is volatile. People are constantly getting abruptly laid off. SD has never been very stable, so you should plan on getting a new job every few years.

Depends on the country, where I'm from there has been very few layoffs.

  • Software companies are constantly looking for ways to make SD easier. As a result, your value will decrease over time, in preference for bootcampers and 2 year degree graduates.

Not sure what to say, I haven't felt my value decrease. All I see are bubbles saying they will replace me.. and then they burst.

Nobody listens to developers. Your manager's beliefs about SD come entirely from consultants, magazines, and Elon Musk tweets.

Agree but that's more of an engineering wide problem, specially when you get managers with very few engineering experience. Take the Apollo landings as an opposite example: great managers that were great engineers.

  • Nobody cares about quality software. If you take the time to make your code efficient and lightweight, all your manager sees is you taking longer to make something than your peers. After all, we can just raise hardware requirements if the software is slow.

This is a bit too generic to argue against. You can get that in electrical engineering no? If you take more time designing that PCB because you want to better place the components to improve heat dissipation, will your manager care in the end?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Never join a robotics startup, lol. You will have to go to standup and it will be useless and annoying basically every time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[-] padge@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

Lol our standup+parking lot is scheduled for an hour. Kill me.

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I've fought this battle so many times.

My most recent battle was being told to implement Scrum and agile practices. When the subject of standup NOT being a status update came up, and I forcibly told people to keep their updates brief, it was changed to a "Sync Meeting" that lasted over an hour. Apparently, despite delivering stuff faster, being able to track velocity and ensure we're not overextending ourselves each "sprint", and actually knowing what we're delivering through actionable tasks - we're not doing agile any more...

[-] _stranger_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It took me a year but I broke my team of this habit. The trick was to remind them that the parking lot shouldn't be scheduled. The whole point is that you continue conversations organically so that it's more like the beginning of a working session instead of the end of a meeting.

[-] Jano@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

*more than 30 seconds to a minute?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] mayo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My boss doesn't do meetings. Every once in a while he approves my vacation request and I get notified it's approved. Sounds better than it is, but it is better than pointless daily meetings. Adult daycare crap.

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

My boss is usually doing WFM and HR duties instead of her own, so no meetings for me either! So far I have a perfect performance record!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] newbeni@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I get every week or so, but every day is just way too much. I'm a big kid, that's what you hired me for, let me work.

[-] doktormerlin@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

Also then there are Jour Fixes and standups for the side projects you got rented out too and and and

[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Jour Fixe

I don't think they use that term in English. And even more surprising, they don't even use it in French. It's a French loanword that somehow only exists in German.

[-] mogranja@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Interesting, thanks for sharing. I love these linguistic quirks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

If I was a in charge of a business I would put a hard email filter (including externally) on corporate jargon because it is too vague and people just use it to seem smarter than they really are. The no-reply would give a lengthy explanation on why it's bad practice.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hmm, I wonder how often it would generate a false positive and force someone to reword something innocuous. My guess is that it would be relatively rare.

Dope. Put garbage language where it belongs.

[-] pachrist@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Most standups are bad because they're not used as a quick collaboration tool, they're used as a demonstration to prove you're working, and then the least productive people talk the most because they're the most desperate to prove they're working.

[-] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Right along with story points.

Not meant to be a measurement of time, but of effort. But everyone ends up using them as a measure of time because that is what the MBA at the end of the tables wants.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I called in sick today so I could skip all the meetings lol

[-] solarvector@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago

But stand-up comedy has something for everyone!

Oh, this is about the depressing nexus between programming and corporate culture. Carry on.

[-] feoh@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

I love how bright bulbs have utterly perverted the spirit of agile development into something so horrible that people are memifying ignoring it rather than trying to fix it.

Repeat after me: If standup takes any more than a minute or two per person you're really really doing it wrong and it isn't standup anymore and needs to be staked, buried and the earth salted that it may never rise again.

For an act of socially immature but oh so satisfying passive aggressive resistance, leave a copy of the Agile Manifesto on your scrum master's desk :)

(Or, if you think they'd be receptive, talk to them about moving long form reporting to any other medium so stand-up can be a simple meeting where folks give blocked/not blocked status and, where blocked, resources are directed to help.

that's it.

Stand-ups where Mortimer from the Front End team gives a 30 minute treatise on why react is a horrible fit for your application ARE IN FACT NOT STAND-UPS.

They're just poorly run meetings in an agile trench coat.

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 6 points 2 weeks ago

Wake up, stand up, talk about your work vaguely enough there are no questions.

[-] Tahl_eN@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

The worst thing about standups is that about once a month I catch a problem early because of what someone says. The tradeoff doesn't feel worth it time-wise. But it keeps me from skipping them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
651 points (97.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32247 readers
189 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS