this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
515 points (98.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27231 readers
2863 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been unmotivated in the past but i think it's time to sort out an alternative.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 207 points 2 months ago (5 children)

A: they’re betting most people will accept it, and they’re right. The same thing happened in the early 80s when cable television advertised themselves as the pay-for-ad-free service, then started sneaking ads in. People complained, sure, but we all saw the outcome. They got away with it.

B: Greed, capitalism, and fuck you.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 102 points 2 months ago (15 children)

A: they’re betting most people will accept it, and they’re right.

Yes. Remember when Netflix put a stop to password sharing and the internet went aflame with people declaring that Netflix had shot itself in the foot? Netflix subscriber counts went up.

The average person will put up with so much more of this nonsense than techie people will.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's why I highly recommend Fmovies, sudo-lol, and others. The barrier to entry is literally a browser and ublock origin and you can watch just about anything.

You can send someone a link to an episode and they can watch it. No sign ups, no ads (with ad block), and pretty decent service. No explaining what a torrent is. No VPN (though I recommend it of course).

Just pure content.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 51 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i haven't had cable, or even a tv, in many years. stayed at a hotel the other day and flicked on the tv because the internet was out (helene), and was flabbergasted that for every 2 minutes of programming, there was at least 5 minutes of the same commercials over and over. people fucking watch this shit? on purpose?

[–] Graphy@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

When my wife and I stay at a hotel we watch cable and put on like QVC shopping channels.

It’s fun to overreact and be like “this is 100 genuine silver painted lead.” Some of the channels will have like changing infographics that flash and explode every second as the price keeps dropping so we make wooshing sounds as it keeps falling to a new low.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Cable television never advertised that. Cable TV started as a “community antenna” system that served people in valleys with existing off-the-air broadcast channels (which had ads); the existence of those systems created a market for satellite-fed channels like HBO (which was always a separate subscription and ad-free) and TBS/CNN (which always carried ads). Other than the premium channels like HBO/Showtime/Cinemax, cable channels have had ads from the beginning.

Once the small cable systems and the media publishers both got consolidated, we started seeing content licensing deals and higher costs to the subscriber to pay for it - but the channels (MTV, Nickelodeon, etc) always carried ads.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 66 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The answer is apathy.

You have to remember that most users simply don't care. The majority of consumers are some combination of either not technologically savvy or just outright intimidated by technology, are not very well educated, are incredibly reluctant to read, are not particularly observant, will not leave their routines or comfort zones without very significant motivation, and have spent their entire lives being the very frog in that gradually boiling pot of ever more numerous and intrusive advertising to the point that they just accept this as "normal." They're busy. They don't read tech headlines. They don't understand what's going on under the hood, and nor do they want to.

Normal people don't see the world like us nerds do. I am positive that these streaming services (and many other businesses) have studied this and understand it very well. If they lose 1% of their business which was made up by vocal nerds, but whatever odious change the just rolled out results in an increase in profit that is greater than the revenue from those subscriptions lost, they'll go ahead and do it anyway.

They think they have a captive audience because by and large they functionally do have a captive audience. This stuff works, and people keep paying for it en masse.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 36 points 2 months ago

I mean, look at Reddit. Huge uproar last year, nothing happened really.

Pretty much every service, platform, app has become worse over the last two or three years. But people keep using them. And not for a lack of alternatives. They are actively hostile against change and many really don't care. They are so used to being fucked over, squeezed for pennies and bombarded with bullshit ads, that they gave up.

The same thing happens in politics, btw. People just vote whatever - if at all, because they already expected to be fucked over. All those activists you see on TV or online are a tiny minority.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 52 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You might ditch, but they have enough data that says enough other people aren't going to.

Just remember whenever you're annoyed by something and think "why is this a thing? This annoys me so it shouldn't happen", there's thousands of other people who can live with it or just don't give a shit.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Consumers mostly don't even care about the content. Over the last 15 years they switched from cable only to now be back on cable again disguised as streaming.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Streaming services have a catastrophic problem they didn't see coming.

As they massively expanded the viewing market, they also gave very accurate viewing metrics compared to broadcast TV.

Also, the many, MANY offerings cut the viewing pie into smaller pieces.

And this is the expectation, mostly because while you might stay with a super hit like GoT, they're super expensive, and huge risks if they don't take off (see acolyte). Cost sensitive people are likely to subscribe for the season then cancel, or just subscribe the month the season finishes.

The alternative is to try to hook you on a bunch of shows, which means having a ton of them and hoping they nail your niche. People are less willing to do this, but it works if you have more disposable income, or value streaming more.

In any case, they can't afford all the shows they have to put on, it's all or nothing now, before they might watch lost on ABC one night, then CBS walker Texas ranger might let the kid fall on the ground the next, but now you have to keep them entertained most days, that's a shit-ton of content. HBO has it worse, they're losing their old cable revenue, and their productions are stupid expensive, and they're one of the winners. Disney has it even worse because disney+ cannibalizes both their cinema sales and they have to put up their crown jewels, star wars and the mcu, all on the same service, devaluing both. Fortunately focusing on kids programming helps because parents basically have to have Disney+ just as a matter of course.

This barely worked on broadcast because the different channels could share the load and cut the ad pie into larger pieces,

If they could count on must-watch blockbusters (ie GoT, which really hurt them when they screwed the landing and killed rewatchability), they could pull it off, but that's so risky, it's betting everything on one spin of the roulette wheel.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I liked reading your response. Wish I had a meaningful response other than there is no way I'm going to feel bad for media companies. If they've painted themselves in a corner I'm sure it was greed that got them there.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Don't feel bad at all for them.

They celebrated like crazy when things were good, now the economics is hitting them like it should.

They, like everyone else in life, will have to figure out how to manage, or not.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because for every one person like you and me with zero ad tolerance, there's hundreds, thousands of plebs who can't be bothered to drop the service. It's the inverse of the whale (re. microtransactions) problem.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I know a few people that actually claim to like watching ads. They have made consumerism part of their identity and they are proud of it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Doubleohdonut@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait till they drop you as a customer by cancelling your payment tier,then send you countless begging letters over the next month begging you to return. If you wanted my money that badly, why did you cancel me NETFLIX?????

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Was at the fair and some lady was loudly announcing selling a streaming device that would stream all movies and shows for free. I asked how she could do that legally? She said Congress in 2011 passed the streaming act. Said any movie or show that is streamed once is by law afterwards public domain.

Someone should tell Disney Plus. Does anyone heard of this?

[–] CyanFen@lemmy.one 24 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Sounds like some sovcit bs

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think about this a lot. In the 2000s, there would be all these music services that hype themselves up. The Downloadable Music Wars. We all used Napster or whatever pirating tool and it was just easier than paying. In the end, they were all smoke and mirrors and the services died out, while Apple and their iPods won.

In the late 2010s was the PC gaming Wars, Steam was really getting some heat. Not just other e-commerce stores like Epic, but also game streaming services like onLive and PC Game Pass. Again, all these wack ass companies (wtf Origin) and most of them have either folded or are on life support and migrated to Steam.

We're currently in the Streaming Wars. Probably the second or third version of this war, since the first war killed Blockbuster. I honestly don't believe many of them will survive past 2030. For sure Netflix and Hulu. Maybe half of them die, and six more will crop up. Who knows.

But what I do know is that whenever these "wars" occur, you see a lot of the shittier companies get worse and worse. And if you never picked a side and did your own thing (ignore them or sail the open seas), you get to look back and laugh at these clowns.

[–] BeneGesseritWitch@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The merging of Hulu and Disney got me thinking that in the end they'll probably all merge into one streaming service with individual channels for each, like 'the Hulu channel', etc. Essentially just reinventing cable.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Remember Netflix's password sharing ban outrage? It didn't work, they gained more subscribers. People stay because they don't know how to sail the high seas or are too lazy to do it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 months ago

If they increase prices by 20% and lose 15% of their customer base, that's an increase in profit.

If they increase their ad duration by 50% and lose 15% of their customer base, that's a huge increase in profit.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Because how else am I going to get those deep creases out of my blouses!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] _pete_@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Because the “you wouldn’t steal a car” nonsense scares a lot of people off

Because some people want to support the creators of content but digital downloads from iTunes or whatever are more expensive than getting a month of a streaming service

Because there is a level of convenience of having thousands of hours of content at your fingertips without having to store content locally or finding it on a “dodgy” website. Setting up torrents / usenet is more work than giving someone your credit card number

Because a lot of people don’t know where to find content and if they did they don’t know the difference between a 480p avi vs a 2160p HDR DV MKV and get confused with torrents and file formats and how to get them on their TV.

Because - at the moment - the ads aren’t that bad, I got one ad at the start and one episode in the middle of an episode of Gen V - obviously they’ll add more until it’s as bad as cable but they’re not there yet.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

The "you wouldn't steal a car" thing actually backfired majorly for the parties involved. It actually did two things. It highlighted that downloading movies was possible and easy to do when it was new and not many people knew about it. And it made people curious. This led to it having the exact opposite effect of what was intended.

https://knowledgesource.com.au/no-bs-how-those-video-ads-spectacularly-back-fired/

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Didn’t they also not license (aka pirate lol) the music in that ad?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because netflix tested it and it was worth it for them. The increased revenue from ads more than made up the subscription fees of users lost.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 months ago

I have zero commercials on my Jellyfin instance.

[–] NutWrench@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 2 months ago (6 children)

If a million porn sites can make streaming video work, then YouTube is replaceable.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] marx2k@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

Wife and I started watching the boys on prime. That's when I realized Amazon is putting ads in the stream.

I just ended up downloading all the seasons in an hour and it's been no ads on Kodi since.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 months ago

https://fmhy.pages.dev/ <-- you might want to check this out because piracy is very wrong and horrible wink wink

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

This is just my opinion, but when Google(and... I don't know, "them?") started cracking down on the "letswatch" and 123movie sites, streaming was in a good place, so people happily jumped over. Now, in the time between that and the state of things now, some people lost their patience and skill with looking up a movie. Both my mom and grandma were fine with the 123movies and what not. The sites started to go down when Netflix was still alright, so it wasn't a big deal. Spend a couple dollars, get all the stuff you want and be sure it's the best quality, and no malware? Fantastic.

By the time it became this state of affairs, my mom just couldn't wrap her head around it. I tried to explain some sites are still there, you just may need to search duckduckgo (which she hates for some reason). She never understood torrenting even though we've gone over it multiple times. I've always liked anime or some shit that was not going to be on Netflix, so I kept using those "skills" and kept up with the changes. Moving to torrenting, a VPN, file converters, learning how to apply subtitles, one by one, over years, it's not a big deal. You just learn as you do. Having to come back to that after how much has changed ostracized a lot of people.

The people who aren't affected by them were never their main focus. They wanted the people who weren't tech savvy, lazy even. They can't figure out a torrent, or how to even find it in the first place. They won't know what to search for to protect themselves and will likely get scared by the first copyright notice. They're hoping that the majority of their customer base will be like that and feel "trapped."

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Their entire survival hinges on keeping investment money flowing, which means they essentially have to lie and over-promise.

A chronic issue plaguing the entire tech and media sector right now. Line must go up no matter the costs.

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 months ago (5 children)

What alternative? Every other service who does the same shit? Or even worse, setup jellyfin with sonarr server to completely automate everything and watch everything for absolutely free and continue to do so forever?? The shit some of these pirates do is disgusting.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Statistics. You're still there and only complaining. I purged all subscription parasites from my life in 2019.

I live by the abstraction, "you can't fix stupid in anyone else but yourself." All you can do is tell others what you did with your one wallet vote and hope that others do the same at some critical mass.

They do it because you're still there, and you care while they do not. You want to think you're human. You're not. You're a new deck chair on a yacht if you're lucky. Most likely, you're no more than a liter or few of diesel.

[–] beeng@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Cos you haven't already. You're a par boiled frog and didn't even notice.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They don't care about you. They don't even want you as a subscriber, you're a pain in the ass. Most people are too tired and not tech savvy enough to pirate. A lot of those will eventually do something else, too, but they can cram ads into the streams faster than those people can find the wherewithal to leave.

In short, this is profitable, and no amount of raging will make it less so. Take care of yourself, but don't pretend you're making line go down.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Pirates life for me

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hulu is treating me with impunity when I reported errors with their apps. Hulu, an eminently cancelable service that a lot of people never paid for in the first place.

Sail the seven seas, friends. These people deserve despondency.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They're banking on their service still being better. In the short term they assume their particular selection of content will provide some inertia to your decision to move, and long term they expect all of the other options are going to do the same thing. Eventually, you'll only be able to stream with commercials, and they'll be back to the balance of their content being the only deciding factor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My steamers don't have any ads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

A vast number of users won’t switch

[–] xChronoZerox@startrek.website 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 8 points 2 months ago

🏴‍☠️

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I've ditched all of them except the Disney/Hulu bundle, and that's only because Amex gives me back $7 a month of the cost.

Amazon Prime used to be okay as a Prime customer, but now you can't watch a 24 minute show without seeing like five ads. I tried to watch an episode of Invincible and there were two ads before the show even started, two in the middle of the show, and one at the end. It's freaking insane.

I barely even watch video these days, I get way more mileage out of a good music service like Qobuz or Tidal.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

Because most people aren't going to ditch them regardless of how many ads they put, and that's good enough for them.

load more comments
view more: next ›