this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
310 points (97.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35774 readers
241 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At this point its getting ridiculous.

Their point 2 even states that even if you do pay them, they will still use cookies to track you and show personalised content

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quicky@lemmy.world 95 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s the fucking Daily Mail, and should be completely avoided anyway.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but sometimes you want to debunk it, or use it as a starting point for other research.

[–] Quicky@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not worth giving them the traffic.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 54 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Moral of the story: don't read the Daily Heil. On top of mining your data like there's no tomorrow, it's a racist, homophobic, transphobic, fascist, pseudoscientific crock of absolute shit.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I noticed people are actually starting to realise the Daily Fail is an absolute shitrag, so they're posting links from The fucking Telegraph instead 😂

Fuck me just get your tweed suit out and start shooting eastern Europeans grandad

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

It's infuriating, isn't it.

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I always find the statement “we care about your privacy” to be a bit meaningless when they then say that they’ll share data with 100s of partners.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

They didn't even bother to write that lol.

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And nothing of value was lost that day (why would you even want to read that rag?)

Though I agree in principle, fuck these scummy practices.

[–] TheEntity@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Isn't it illegal under GDPR? It seems to be the exact same thing Facebook tried to do.

[–] andrew_s@piefed.social 17 points 2 months ago

I think they're all pushing their luck with it, trying to get away with it until any actual legal repercussions happen. I first saw this a while ago with a French newspaper - apparently the majority of newspapers there do it.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Saw a German IT magazine that does the same shit report about a judge ruling that as being illegal a little while ago.

[–] JonnyRobbie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, some sites in the Czech Republic do it too, unfortunately. IANAL, so I don't know if that's illegal under GDPR, but I hope it is illegal and their luck runs out.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

The Mail has less utility than toilet paper.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Don't read this disgusting Murdoch rag. The Daily Heil should honestly just skip the cookies and data farming and simply shoot all of its readers.

[–] purrtastic@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 months ago

I don’t think it’s earned by Murdoch, but otherwise agree with the sentiment.

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Paid cookies opt out should be illegal

[–] Gurfaild@feddit.org 17 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It probably is illegal in the EU, but I have no idea whether it would be illegal in the UK, too.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 months ago

As of last I checked, people are trying it out and seeing if they can get away with it under the way GDPR is enforced. Hopefully that gets hammered out in court.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To my knowledge, the problem is the same in the EU, but there are legal initiatives by some NGOs (NOYB) that argue that having only these two options (pay for subscription or consent to personal information being sold) should be illegal, and that newspapers should be required to offer a third option (pay only the amount your information would be sold for, which is only a few cents, without the subscription).

[–] phlaym@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Very happy to see that, thanks for the pointer!

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

True that would make sense

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Its not even an option. They will still use cookies even if you pay. They'd just use it for their own use

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago
[–] codapine@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

Fuck the Daily Mail.

[–] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 8 points 2 months ago

Browser reader's mode and Archive Today: hold our beers.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Purchase a subscription to not get personalised ads? So even when you pay, you still get ads, they are just not personalised.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Its the same thing Facebook came up with

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How do you know they don't just sell your data anyways?

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

If they don't already, they will. The insatiable desire for profit means that even if you paid them $1000 a month for their dogshit rag, they'd sell your data to make $1001 dollars.

Regulations are the only answer and they have to be both enforced and punished heavily enough to not make it worth risking.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

or use firefox with ublock origin.

ublock origin blocks most of these trackers.