52
submitted 2 days ago by schizoidman@lemm.ee to c/europe@feddit.org

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/44916164

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 32 points 1 day ago

You had literally decades to develop cheap EVs.

[-] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

The arrogance is astounding. They still act like their ICE are current technology.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.org 50 points 2 days ago

Nuh Uh! Reducing emissions is more important than your fucking job you fucked up so hard in. It was your job to build up strategies to reduce the impact of 2035. Yet what did you do? Nothing, just the same shit.

Fuck you and Söder!

[-] federalreverse@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

Fucking fucked shit fuck

You may be overdoing it. :)

I think it’s the perfect amount of fuck.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh sorry. It, anger, just came over me :(

[-] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 52 points 2 days ago

THERE IS NO GODDAMN PETROL ENGINE BAN.

There is a ban on engines though that can't run without creating additional CO2 emissions from 2035 though. Tough luck for fossil engines in their current configurations, but not unsolvable for the very special applications where they'll still be needed.

[-] Quittenbrot@feddit.org 17 points 1 day ago

Even better: given that the Chinese automotive industry is highly invested in EVs whereas the demand for (premium) ICE cars is largely provided by foreign companies such as BMW, have a good guess whether China will switch its own market rules accordingly when it sees time fit for its own industry.

[-] federalreverse@feddit.org 4 points 23 hours ago

They've already done that to a large degree which is why VW and others are already feeling down:

  • Beijing and other big cities use a lottery system to limit car registrations. The majority of lottery tickets are already for BEVs and hybrids.
  • Exhaust emissions requirements already go beyond Euro 7, making it impossible to sell most built-for-EU cars in China.
  • There is some kind of NEV (New Energy Vehicle) incentive and afaik, that only goes to Chinese cars. I'm not sure whether it's enough for the car to be built in China or whether it needs to be from a Chinese-owned brand as well.
[-] Quittenbrot@feddit.org 2 points 23 hours ago

I’m not sure whether it’s enough for the car to be built in China or whether it needs to be from a Chinese-owned brand as well.

Given that you cannot build cars in China without having to go into a joint venture with a Chinese company that probably won't matter much to them.. :)

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

These morons never look beyond the next quarterly results. Even if the EU still allows ICE cars, they won't be competitive on the world market. That means that the EU has its little island, where the incumbents still get to pollute the world and fleece their customers but the rest of the world market (except the US) will belong to China.

[-] federalreverse@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago

With Northvolt purportedly(!) demonstrating that even EU battery production can apparently be thwarted by a Chinese tooling company sabotaging, there's probably some reason to panic.

I suspect though that the only way for EU-based car companies to find out how to refine battery materials and to produce battery cells, at scale, is to lure Chinese companies to the EU and learn from them for the next couple years. They should know that strategy very well — it's exactly the way their Chinese JVs worked out.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Of course there's reason to panic. Every independent expert has been shouting from the rooftops for the last decade at least, that the EU are falling behind in battery technology. But politics and industry have been in denial and are completely incapable of long term planning. So now they wake up and start panicking.

[-] schizoidman@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

With Northvolt purportedly(!) demonstrating that even EU battery production can apparently be thwarted by a Chinese tooling company sabotaging

Is there a source for that?

[-] federalreverse@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There is, but it's a Swedish politics blog and even they threw in that they couldn't check the claims. So not exactly a good source. See this thread: https://lemmy.world/comment/12445221

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

If I'm not mistaken, BYD is already building factories in the EU. Probably assembly and not battery though.

[-] Melchior@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago

Maybe BMW should use its Goebbels connections to get some batteries from Varta....

[-] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

Ah! We‘ll be less reliant on China, when we hold on to old technology and let them do the progress thing. Interesting thinking. Wouldn’t want to work in this guy’s company.

[-] Vendul@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Let’s move forward not backwards? Can someone from the world department fire this loser? Oh and also tell china to stop fucking around.

[-] Quittenbrot@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago

Thanks, but no thanks. Next.

[-] 0x815@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

Back in July this year, the chairman of US carmaker Ford in Germany insists on the end for combustion engines in the EU.

I only found an article in German, here is a summary in English:

The chairman of the supervisory board of the US-based car manufacturer Ford in Germany, Gunnar Herrmann, stronlgy warned against a reversal of the planned end of sales for new cars with combustion engine in 2035 in the EU. "If you believe in prosperity, growth and the future, then leave the goals as they are," Herrmann told the "Bild" newspaper. Otherwise, the automotive industry location of Germany as a whole is also at risk.

Those who still demanded a change in the intended drive to electric cars proved above all that they "have no strategy" and "now pray to the good God that they can continue the old stuff", said Herrmann. Anyone who wants to stop the development would endanger the site, because "then the cars will come from China".

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He's right. Some autos (and governments) have done enormous long-term investments towards electrification in an attempt to meet these requirements. Battery factories, assembly plants retooling, etc. Ford is one of them. BMW is not.

[-] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

I watched the interview he did with Bild and his interviewer constantly tried to push him in the direction of electric vehicles bad.

[-] 0x815@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

This is Springer media.

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
52 points (91.9% liked)

Europe

1369 readers
310 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS