216
submitted 15 hours ago by yoasif@fedia.io to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

We’ve been anticipating it for years,1 and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the ...

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tubbadu@lemmy.kde.social 2 points 1 hour ago

Total ignorant question: how hard would it be to fork (and mostly maintain) chromium keeping manifest V2 support?

[-] MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 hours ago

b-b-b-but brave will still pay me brace bux if i watch their ads right???

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 hours ago

Yeah we’ve known this was coming ever since Manifest V3 was a done deal. We’ve had years of foreshadowing and months of warning to get off Chromium.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 hours ago

I've scene posts about Firefox enterprise from a business perspective. I wonder if we will see Firefox suddenly show up more in the business world. Ublock origin can save you from phishing links and malwarertizing

[-] moe90@feddit.nl 4 points 6 hours ago

My company allow the usage of Firefox, Chrome and Edge and these browsers are mandatory installed on our corporate computers. But, our users just pick the Chrome and Edge.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 hours ago

You got to force it then

Be the shitty admin you want to see

[-] infinitevalence@discuss.online 24 points 12 hours ago

I moved back to Firefox a few years ago on desktop and mobile. It's perfectly fine and seems less laggy that Chrome.

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 53 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I hope they end up killing Chrome.

[-] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 28 points 14 hours ago

I think you're being optimistic about the number of people who both use adblockers and who care enough to switch browsers.

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago

Yeah I fear society will get to the point in corporate autocracy, or corporate-feudalism where Google sues uBlock Origin out of existence (for lost revenue).

...and that'll be a dark day, and it will be hard not to blame the people who just put up with ads and a loss of privacy. Who can just stomach Surveillance Capitalism's incredibly flawed and one sided nature.

Those people are laying bricks for the foundation of a society I don't agree with, and don't want to participate in.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 6 points 12 hours ago

Based on every browser statistic page I can find, about 2/3 of mobile traffic is through Google Chrome. There's no ad blocker on that.

And mobile traffic is significant nowadays - it comprises around half of all traffic anywhere, despite requiring the viewer to be hunched over a phone or tablet.

[-] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Not that many people use real computers any more. At work, you may need to use a computer, but you probably can’t change the browser. At home, you have the PCMR folks who use a computer and probably also care about browsers. Everyone else just uses a tablet or a phone for browsing the web.

Speaking of the web, most people interact with specific websites through an app and an API, so they don’t even launch the mobile browser until they have to visit a site that doesn’t have an app. The world has changed and browsers aren’t as relevant as they used to be.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago

What? They’re not going to kill their own browser that they virtually exclusively control. Why would they kill one of their biggest cash cows? Google is an ad company, and they want control of the client software that we use which they pump ads to and exfiltrate our identities from.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Whoosh

I think they were talking about Chrome becoming obsolete. Unlikely but not impossible

[-] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 8 points 13 hours ago

Vivaldi is including its own adblock outside of the manifest system that uses many of the same blocklists that uBlock does (although at this point you have to add them manually) and hopes to get near the same functionality by the time it is pulled and Mv3 is implemented. They originally had plans to offer a Mv2 compliant area but after seeing how Mv3 was going to be implemented, they changed there plans to many users dismay.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 hours ago

I don't think many people use Vivaldi. Also it is mostly proprietary so that's a hard pass for me.

[-] theorangeninja@lemmy.today 3 points 6 hours ago

Roughly 92% of the browser’s code is open source coming from Chromium, 3% is open source coming from us, which leaves only 5% for our UI closed-source code.

https://vivaldi.com/blog/technology/why-isnt-vivaldi-browser-open-source/

Only the UI part is not open source.

[-] tubbadu@lemmy.kde.social 2 points 2 hours ago

What's the point of keeping part of the UI closed source?

[-] JustMarkov@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 hours ago

Partially proprietary still means proprietary.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee -4 points 12 hours ago

In my personal experience, and with great regret, I must say that Brave does a better job with its built-in ad blocking than Vivaldi has. Even after I did my damnedest to tweak the ad blocker settings (adding more lists from more sources, removing the "allow some ads" list, etc).

[-] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago

Brave itself is filled with ads. Crypto wallets, BAT, VPNs. I just want a browser.

[-] d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 hours ago

But how else will Brandon Eich fund his homophobia and covid conspiracies?

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
216 points (98.6% liked)

Firefox

17751 readers
541 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS