this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
46 points (97.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54500 readers
744 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Are there any good docker containers that have an openvpn + qbittorrent configuration setup in such a way that the torrents won't run if the vpn isn't running?

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] clamzz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

This looks cool, but I think I'm missing how this installs in a docker container. I feel stupid for being confused by this 🤔

[–] fiofiofio@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The binhex container has worked well for me on Unraid.

[–] MadCybertist@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I second this. I prefer their deluge container but really like how binhex has things set up.

[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This actually looks basically exactly like what I want, but only runs on arch. I do have an arch server but it's not my normal tor server. Is there a debian version of this? If not it's cool, I might put it on my arch server, it'd just be easier to keep it on my existing tor server.

[–] please_lemmy_out@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Arch is just the base that is used for the containers. It doesn't matter what your host OS is.

[–] Kururin@talk.kururin.tech 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] zouhair@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Asks to be installed as root, nah

[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Well that looks really neat

[–] zedricxks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So question does a vpn in a docker container directly tunnel that docker to the vpn basically not touching anything outside of it(i.e home ip/net)?

[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, it can only affect the network of the container

[–] zedricxks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah interesting. Might be worth looking into the saltbox someone posted above. I currently use a seedbox service

[–] Toribor@corndog.uk 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I run wireguard in one container (as a client connected to Mullvad), and then qBittorent in another container but using the network of the wireguard container.

Then I just set up routing rules in wireguard to allow my local network to be exempted from the tunnel so I can reach the web interface of qBittorent.

All my torrent traffic goes over the VPN, I can still reach the webui and none of my other containers are affected. Super simple and very reliable.

[–] zedricxks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now you got me thinking Might actually make a post asking for an equivalent usenet (box) to have a usenet and seedbox on prem:D

[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

That Saltbox one can be used for both Usenet or torrents

[–] microwavedgerbil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

haugene/docker-transmission-openvpn might be what you’re looking for. I’ve had success with that container in the past.

[–] MrReBot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Can confirm have been running this for years now without much issue

load more comments
view more: next ›