733
submitted 5 days ago by Dot@feddit.org to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hayduke@lemmy.world 200 points 5 days ago

Hey look, a foreigner actively engaging in voter fraud!

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 44 points 5 days ago

Next he’ll be eating dogs… right?

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 25 points 5 days ago

His emerald mine slaves may have to eat dog to survive.

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

More likely they get fed to the dogs if they misbehave.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 days ago

They already have that position covered.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 140 points 5 days ago

It's too fucking bad that the FEC is essentially powerless due to partisan politics.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 113 points 5 days ago

Republican partisan politics.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 58 points 5 days ago

Oh, 100% - I should have been clearer that this erosion of enforcement is entirely driven by the GOP and quite intentional.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 27 points 5 days ago

Things like this are their goal when they use buzz words like relaxed regulation, "small government", and "free market".

The phrase "partisan politics" is pretty solidly in the realm of "both sides" rhetoric.

[-] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago

America badly needs electoral reform and viable third parties. This FPTP, pay-to-win system creates is such a dumpster fire.

[-] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 5 days ago

This is in contrast to the regular legal type of vote buying of course.

[-] Heikki@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago

You mean like the practice of handing out water, watm beverages, and sometimes snacks to people stuck in long waiting likes to vote in mostly southern and majority, minority districts. If only giving a $1 bottle of water away for free was nearly as bad as giving away $1,000,000 to potential voters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Belkor@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Musk claims it is "a random $1 million payment each day to one registered voter" but is it really random or he is cherry picking 'specific' supporters?

I doubt anyone is getting money

[-] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"Another Melon Eusk won the daily lottery? Sure seems to be a common name!"

[-] Strider@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Well maybe someone gets $100 staging they got 1m.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago

Garland: "I will treat this with as much importance as I do with everything surrounding Trump doing bad things...."

[-] Djefferyw360@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago
[-] neidu2@feddit.nl 23 points 5 days ago

And Speech is free money. Source: Skyrim

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

In principle, the same is true for the real world.

It it one of my favorite silly thought experiments: what could someone do if they were persuasive enough? The answer is, in principle, pretty much anything.

Imagine someone with the Devil's charisma; they can literally persuade anyone into anything. Such a person, coming from nowhere, could be running the entire country in an afternoon.

  1. Walk to the White House gate. Persuade the guard to let you in to meet a staffer.

  2. Meet the staffer. Persuade them to let you meet with the president and vice president.

  3. Persuade the Vice President to resign, and persuade the President to nominate you as the new VP and set up a meeting with key house and senate leaders.

  4. Persuade the House and Senate to confirm your nomination.

  5. Persuade the President to resign.

In the real world, if they had a high enough "charisma score," anyone could literally become president in a single afternoon. They could be an absolute nobody with zero background in leadership or high office. But if someone had some demonic ability to just talk people into anything, they could be running the country in an afternoon.

[-] boatswain@infosec.pub 4 points 5 days ago

Good thing real life doesn't follow videogame logic

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 9 points 4 days ago

“Clearly illegal” has become the new “our best iPhone yet.”

You can expect to hear it very regularly and also expect that it will make zero difference.

[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

This crime is the thinnest yet!

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago
[-] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Seems like it should have been " charged with"

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Is this like that email that if you forwarded it, Bill Gates was gonna make you a bazillionaire, because he invented the Internet or something?

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Cool, so it’s fine if Mark Cuban does the same thing for the Democrats, right?

Right???

[-] perishthethought@lemm.ee 49 points 5 days ago
[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 53 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Of course he’s not, it’s a hypothetical question. It would be election interference if the Democrats did it.

The Republicans, however can ostensibly do whatever the crap they want without repercussions as the FEC looks on with their head all the way up their own sphincter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

~~Idiots~~ Right-wingers will assert that George Soros is, no evidence wanted or needed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 22 points 5 days ago

I see articles like this stating he has donated $0 and doesn't intend to contribute anything. He also calls out Musk for what he is doing.

According to OpenSecrets.org, which tracks campaign financing, Cuban last donated to a candidate in 2002, when he gave $1,000 to Democratic California Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren's campaign.

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Of course, since most of the internet can't detect sarcasm, you're getting down voted.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

I’ll be more shocked if anything comes of it

[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Seems like a good way to raise money for a charity you like. Say, planned parenthood. Get everyone you know to sign the petition. Vote for whomever you want and but that trash bag weasels money to good use.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
733 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3586 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS