201
submitted 2 weeks ago by GiddyGap@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 36 points 2 weeks ago
[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

"Reality has a Liberal bias."
-Reoublicans

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl -3 points 2 weeks ago

Democrats aren't left tho

Teba Latef, an 18-year-old Pittsburgh freshman studying neuroscience, said she’s undecided and feels like Trump and Harris don’t speak with nuance about important issues. 

“They take advantage of different kinds of people,” she said, “Trump takes advantage of men who feel like they’re being left behind and Harris is manipulating women who are concerned about their reproductive rights, knowing that realistically bringing the nationwide right to abortion back is nearly impossible.”

Holy false equivalence, Batman. I dare say I don’t think that’s the caliber of incisive intellect that neuroscience demands.

[-] dumples@midwest.social 9 points 2 weeks ago

What it sounds like is an 18 year old who doesn't yet understand how the world works and how voting will work. You will never get a candidate (especially for president) who 100% matches what you believe. You got to pick the best realistic choice and try to get the best you can. Realistically a president has a limit to power and can't get everything but if you care abortion rights Kamala is who you pick. And getting a nationwide right to abortion back isn't nearly impossible. Its hard but not impossible

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

The sooner kids realize that the real world is disappointing the better. They'll set more realistic expectations.

[-] dumples@midwest.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

I wouldn't go that far but for presidential politics yes. Local you can dream big

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe if you lived in a town of six or seven people. Any time you have more than that things get disappointing quickly.

[-] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Spent your whole life as a kid talking about how the old people are outta touch. Now your the middle aged guy and think you shit gold. Classic, happens every generation.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I don't shit gold, which is just another example of how life is disappointing.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

As someone in a STEM career, we do a massive disservice to STEM majors by making their studies so goddamned silo'd.

I spent a couple of years undeclared before locking into STEM, and because of that I was able to enjoy a much more robust education, and I have to say that the difference is massive. And it really shows in the professional world.

So many otherwise (clearly, very) intelligent people who seem to lack basic understanding of political theory, history, economics, philosophy, etc. My field is lousy with them. They may be an expert in the technical field of xyz, but try carrying on a conversation about politics with them (and proceed to die inside).

The most useful and important things that I learned in college, by far, were: the ability to think critically, and recognize and identify fallacious reasoning; how to do proper research on a topic; and, the importance of being constantly aware of one's own biases as much as possible.

All things that I never would have learned had I not spent ~2 years without a major (I'd also have much less student loan debt, but that's a different discussion).

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl -5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Wdym. She sounds to have her head on pretty straight. These two parties are both terrible and very similar. We have better options.

[-] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Pick the candidate that is openly talking about protecting women's rights, or pick the guy who thinks immigrants are eating pets and that each state, no matter how backwards, can decide on what rights you have to your body, which is always causing tragedies.

Man, what a hard choice. /s

[-] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

"Lean" is a terrifying word. Shouldn't they be pushing against it?

Source : am old white guy

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Lean is way too fucking soft, given that the right sees them as subservient baby machines.

They shouldn't be leaning, they should be sprinting to the left.

The women of Afghanistan know what right wing rule is like and they'd love to slap some sense into American women

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago

Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Associated Press:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://apnews.com/article/elections-harris-trump-gender-young-women-303f06bd974545e603d5a004f48a3702
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl -4 points 2 weeks ago

Thats concerning.

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
201 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4670 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS