this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
55 points (96.6% liked)

Free Software

1057 readers
63 users here now

What is free software?

Free software is software that respects the 4 software freedoms. The 4 freedoms are

Please note: Free software does not relate to monetary price. Free software can be sold or gratis (no cost)

Rules:

  1. Please keep on topic
  2. Follow the Lemmy.zip rules
  3. No memes
  4. No "circle jerking" or inflammatory posts
  5. No discussion of illegal content

Please report anything you believe to violate the rules and be sure to include rhetoric on why you think it should be removed.

If you would like to contest mod actions please DM me with your rational as to why you feel that the relivant mod action should be reversed. Remember to use rhetoric and to site any relevant sources. You will only get one chance to argue your point and continued harassment will result in a ban.

Overall this community is pretty laid back and none if the things list above normally are an issue.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think it's important once in a blue moon to have these sorts of "What the fuck is actually wrong with you? We're volunteers" public shamings of people who actually act this disgustingly entitled to other people's work.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's easy to conflate two ideas, though, so be careful.

I've experienced some frustration when a project - ohai, gitlab - makes some colossally stupid decisions - shitty slow editor, the new runner reg automated-but-really-manual mess, continually gluing fat pieces into the mainstream code, etc - and as soon as we suggest, for example, that a shit-slow editor that looks like actual ass isn't the best idea, we get "well it's open source, so spend 5 minutes learning the entirety of the codebase and just make your own fork." As if that's feasible.

All I'm saying is, sometimes they're not acting entitled as much as they're mourning the loss of something they liked as it dies, and they have no outlet to express loss in a manner that does anything.

People can appear like dicks without acting maliciously. I'm the poster-child for that.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sure, I agree there's a line as a FOSS contributor and user myself, but this is well past that line. By the time you start telling the maintainers of a FOSS project which you don't donate to (let alone one which is donationless), which has no income of any sort, which you have never worked on, and which you have no intention of ever working on that they're "stingy" for not spending their own money on testing your specific use case and to "get off their ass", you're well into "PRs welcome :)" territory, and there's a reasonable argument that they're even past that into "lol bye *ban*" territory.

[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

uBlock Origin developers and volunteers are doing an incredible job to make the Internet a better place for all of us. They deserved all of our dearest respect.

Even if they did take donations, that doesn't make anyone entitled to push them to do something. Donations is a gift, you can't expect anything in return. Keep this in mind when you are giving to other FOSS projects, or artists or streamers, etc

[–] Rinzler@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

No one in the US contributes to uBO? Damn

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I can buy them a Netflix account and I'll even get a server so they can VPN straight to my house and pretend they're me! I will literally suck a dude's dick if you can explain to me how that helps fight against the mental parasitism of ads!

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is a reminder to keep it civil. Everyone is pretty chill as of writing this but if things get out of hand I will lock this post.