55
submitted 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

As a Georgia Power (Southern Company subsidiary) ratepayer, this offends me. I will now vote with my dollar to punish them.

Oh wait, I can't because it's a fucking monopoly!

It is literally tyranny that a de-jure monopoly like this is allowed to publicly have an opinion at all, and even more so that it's allowed to fund the broadcasting of said propaganda with money forcibly extracted from its ratepayers (who have absolutely no say in the matter, short of disconnecting from the power grid).

[-] growsomethinggood@reddthat.com 5 points 6 hours ago

I'm really not one to defend companies, but this is a bit of a weird take, and it makes the author sound really unfamiliar with this business sector. White papers are very common and not peer reviewed, basically they're a glorified memo with statistics. Don't rely on white papers for any information besides what that company is saying about itself and its experience.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 hours ago

For sure...but it's being run as an ad, and people are absolutely awful at telling the difference between this kind of ad and editorial content, even when it's plainly labeled.

[-] growsomethinggood@reddthat.com 4 points 6 hours ago

So is the critique for Southern Company for writing some marketing material, or for The Atlantic for running an ad about it?

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

For the Atlantic for being willing to run it in a format that confuses readers, the Public Utilities Commissions in the states where the Southern Company operates for letting the Southern Company do this kind of thing with ratepayer money, and the Southern Company itself for trying to mislead people.

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
55 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5174 readers
674 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS