this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
36 points (82.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2904 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Buckle up and brace for impact.

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 34 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

According to The Carolina Journal, Harris is not abandoning the Tar Heel State, but is now focusing her energy on the Raleigh market, where she leads former President Donald Trump.

Focus on the area with the most voters and keep GröpenFührer throwing money at the state.

Also early voting is showing the 55% of the voters are women compared to 44% men. That could be a good sign for Harris.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

She and Walz are still campaigning there. It's not like they're completely giving up. It sounds more like this is a redirect rather than completely pulling out.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

There was no way NC was going to vote for her. They'll reject the batshit crazy governor, but they won't vote for a Democratic President.

Look at the history:

2020 - Trump
2016 - Trump
2012 - Romney
2008 - Obama
2004 - Bush
2000 - Bush
1996 - Dole
1992 - Bush
1988 - Bush
1984 - Reagan
1980 - Reagan
1976 - Carter
1972 - Nixon
1968 - Nixon

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Women are leading the early voting 55% to 44%.

Don't count her out just yet, homey.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Conservative women still won't vote for a Democrat.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Just need a few here and a few there, and it's doable.

The current tally:

33% Dem

34% Rep

33% Other.

It's definitely doable.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 2 weeks ago

It's also difficult to believe that statistically significant numbers of registered Democrats would vote for Trump, while it wouldn't be a surprise for statistically significant numbers of registered Republicans voting for Harris.

[–] ericatty@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago

Anecdotal, I live in NC and know 3 registered Republicans so far who have cast their votes for Harris, I am "Unaffiliated" and voted for Harris. All of us ended up voting straight Dem on the whole ballot because there is so much crazy on our ballots this year.

The Republicans I know are never Trumpers and just don't want to give up on the fantasy of what they think the party is supposed to be.

I'm Unaffiliated because in NC you can choose which primary you want to vote when you show up. And sometimes I feel like I can do more good voting in the Republican primary, but other years have voted in the Dem primary.

My point, I'm hoping so hard there are a lot of Rino's and Unaffiliated early voting Harris, Stein, Jackson.

[–] scarabine@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

The really optimistic-for-Harris forecast I’ve cited a few times has even odds for Harris and Trump on NC. Basically if we don’t see huge turnout numbers it’s Trump’s. The best we can hope for is that Robinson really, really put people off of voting.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 7 points 2 weeks ago

It's low odds for sure, but early turnout is high. NC is always a tug-of-war between urban and rural, so this is nothing new and why they're concentrating on the populated areas. Between good turnout, potential Republicans showing up but not voting for Trump necessarily, and hopefully limited disfranchising of voters in certain demographic areas like in the past...it's not over. And hey, anything helps the popular vote count regardless.

Obama's win in 2008 was close and not a cakewalk either.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago

Mediaite - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Mediaite:

Wiki: mixed - There is some consensus that Mediaite is only marginally reliable, and should be avoided where better sources are available. Editors consider the source to inappropriately blur news and opinion, and due weight should be considered if no other reliable sources support a given statement.


MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.mediaite.com/politics/harris-campaign-pulls-millions-in-ad-spending-in-north-carolina-amid-surge-of-republican-early-voters/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support