-20

Pure walled-garden behavior from the Minetest devs.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Niquarl@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

I don't see how this is such a big issue. Would feel weird to not be able to change username per server. Sometimes as my name for playing with friends or a pseudonyme if playing with strangers?

[-] mlfh@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago

The feature request includes the phrase "Behind the scenes there would need to be some cryptographic magic," because it's just yet another "I have a sweet idea for an app, bro, I just need you to do the coding for me" pitch.

The project has 766 contributors with pull requests being accepted all the time. That's not a walled garden.

[-] hankskyjames777@thebrainbin.org -4 points 1 week ago

What I meant by "walled garden" is about federation and not commits, like look at the Signal app federation situation, they rejeted it because it might be confused with cyptocurrency, which I did hate because of its volatility

[-] joeldebruijn@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Alternative idea .... Someone uses OpenConext to provide a federation hub connecting minetest servers with identity providers. You can even call it LuantiID.

https://openconext.org/

this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
-20 points (4.5% liked)

OpenSourceGames

2546 readers
2 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS