this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
187 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59357 readers
4030 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 91 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Is this their attempt to get out of that negligence suit where that person died and they tried to force arbitration from the clause in a free trial of Disney plus?

[–] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 31 points 2 weeks ago

Article says the erroneous menus weren't distributed. So, probably not.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

Well, as that was a restaurant not managed by Disney, but through an independent pub owner in their public market area... I kind of doubt it.

It should be trivially easy to prove either way.

There will either be records on when it was changed or when it was discovered and fixed.

If there isnt, then it didnt fucking happen and Disney is lying.

[–] argh_another_username@lemmy.ca 47 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you want to screw with your former employer, screw your former employer. This is criminal.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This sounds like a scapegoat.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe, but eugenicists exist.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

I also agree that eugenicists exist.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That's why you disable their account before telling them they're fired.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 20 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You mean you don't give them 2 weeks notice on firing?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago

If you'll find for course you don't get given notice. If somebody is breaking the rules and being dangerous you don't want them hanging around for another 2 weeks you want them gone now.

If it's a layoff then yeah you get notice

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The US is at will, nobody gives 2 weeks for termination unless maybe it's a layoff. If a company has grounds to fire you they just fire you. Most will be smart enough to disable accounts before you're even out the door.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

Even in locations where you are required to give notice, you can just pay out the notice period.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

"Most" is optimistic. I don't have statistical information proving otherwise, but anecdotally I am not so sure. A big company like Disney with their own team of IT and official policies and this still happened is exhibit A.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

No. You give 2 Months.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn't sound like an account access problem, sounds like a shared password problem.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

No, it's definitely hacking because that makes me a hacker with my friends sports TV subscription 👨‍💻😎

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

In a company as blue-chip as Disney, the discontinuation of access and privileges and security clearance are indicators of imminent repositioning, likely firing if you've engaged in mischief (such as voicing your opinion or comparing salaries).

It's why you give sweet Christmas presents to the awkward guy in HR and invite him to all your socials. Blow him if he's into it. He's your intel source regarding who is in danger of discharge, and if the boss doesn't like you.

This disgruntled guy had to be lower rank than the mailroom if HR wasn't given notice, and his access was super low priority. No-one cared.

(Yes, I'm bitter.)

[–] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 40 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Removing the allergen warning is basically some form of attempted manslaughter.

[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago

Which Disney apparently sort of did on their own, but now they’re funding news stories about an employee who went rogue ! Ha see Disney isn’t at fault!! Right?! 🙃

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Murder. Firing a gun in a crowd is not manslaughter because you don't see exactly who you are killing. You know it's going to kill someone and that's the goal so it's murder.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Outsourced IT and not all Apps were not AD authenticated, is my guess. It's probably a request sitting in a queue waiting for SLA.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Jesus, if he had only done the allergy thing and not the profanity or wingdings it's likely nobody would have noticed and people would have died(!)