PCGaming

6498 readers

4 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

CSFFlame@lemmy.world

Intel says integrating RAM into Lunar Lake SoC was a mistake, might abandon desktop GPUs again | TechSpot (www.techspot.com)

submitted 1 week ago by woelkchen@lemmy.world to c/pcgaming@lemmy.world

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Intel in 1990: "the market will have less demand for dedicated graphics cards in the future"

Intel in 2000: "the market will have less demand for dedicated graphics cards in the future"

Intel in 2010: "the market will have less demand for dedicated graphics cards in the future"

Intel in 2020: "maybe we should make a dedicated graphics card?"
NVIDIA in 2020: "hold my diamond crusted, 24 carat beer while I stomp this n00b"

Intel in 2024: "the market will have less demand for dedicated graphics cards in the future"

[–] kugmo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

fuck i want their desktop gpus to do well but they have so much catch up to do and i can't ditch my current gpu 'just to support the underdog' (who wasn't an underdog for many years in the cpu department).