this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
165 points (91.0% liked)

News

23367 readers
2898 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 77 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Prices didn't go back down.

[–] SpacePirate@lemmy.ml 65 points 2 weeks ago

News flash, most Americans were paycheck to paycheck before inflation, too.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 48 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"I've turned off the oven, yet food is still burnt"

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you really want to compare that to inflation slowing, then you haven't turned off the oven, you just slowed down the rate that you are making it hotter.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 36 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

“Inflation” to economists is how much the price is going up this month.

“Inflation” to most people is how much stuff costs.

It feels like there needs to be some acknowledgement of that when this is all talked about, after the superinflation of 2022. The goal should be that prices go back down, not that they go back to going up by 3% per year now that they’re way up high.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

The levers which incentives wages closing the gap on the "super inflation" are probably more realistic than the levers that would cause the prices of everything to deflate.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You really don't want deflation. The correct thing now is for wages to go up to match the new costs and this has been happening.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's not really true though. The only way to maintain infinite inflation is with infinite growth. But we only have finite resources. We also have modern examples of countries that experience deflation and they aren't the horror shows that the finance industry wants about. For example, Japan.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The only way to maintain infinite inflation is with infinite growth

No - monetary policy also effects inflation. See also "stagflation".

We also have modern examples of countries that experience deflation and they aren’t the horror shows that the finance industry wants about. For example, Japan.

It doesn't have to be a "horror show" for it to be "bad". Japan's "lost decades" are hardly desirable.

Deflation would mean money is worth more. Great! But then prices drop. And then salaries drop. And now the ability for somebody to pay back a 30-yr. fixed mortgage gets harder over time rather than easier as it does in an inflationary environment.

So yeah - I'd rather a pay rise to match (or hopefully exceed) inflation that makes it easier for me to repay loans.

Edit: Oh - and frankly the thing that tends to lead to "disaster" is a rapid change in any direction. The entire goal of the "2%" inflation is "price stability". The US economy going into deflation would be catastrophic from our current trend.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You mean all those people who thought housing was an investment would get caught with a bad investment?

Oh shucks. Well, I better get back in line for the organ grinding machine then.

Both cycles have their downsides. Nobody is saying they don't. But having one without the other is unsustainable. You're afraid salaries will go down. Guess what? They went down anyways. They show a higher number, but every year they don't beat inflation is a year they went down. If wages drop during inflation and deflation, in real and gross terms, then I would venture to guess that inflation or deflation isn't the core problem there, but letting corporations rig the game so they always win over the workers. Also if 2% inflation is stabilization, why isn't 2% deflation? There's no magic thing about crossing the line that makes the economy crash.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You mean all those people who thought housing was an investment would get caught with a bad investment?

WTAF are you talking about? No - I'm talking about home ownership, purchasing a vehicle, starting a business, expanding a business, doing home repair / expansion, etc.

Do you just think "hey - one thing went wrong once so everything to do with that is broken"?

I won't continue this conversation - it's not worth it.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

All of that still happens in countries with deflation.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

to most people is how much stuff costs.

inflation to most people is an increase in the cost of stuff* FTFY

also to be clear, the goal is that wages rise to meet the increased inflation, that's the historical trend.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah. Because wages have remained stagnant, or even decreased relative to prices. Inflation is supposed to be a response to people making more money, but that never happened. So now we're all just effectively poorer.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Inflation can happen for a bunch of reasons. It's just always cited in arguments against raising wages. The proper answer to which is, prices went up last year anyways, why can't prices go up a cent so I can have a dollar?

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They'll keep waiting too. Because without some shock therapy like raising min wage to like $25 an hour overnight and taking that economic hit it's never going to get any better. This is the new normal until that happens.

"inflation has slowed, but prices are still high? Why is that?"

literally the title of this thread/article

Man i sure wonder why my rate of increase % lowering hasn't done much to change the value that it's cumulatively adding on top of....

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 weeks ago

You guys are getting pay checks?

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Many Americans" have always and will always live paycheck to paycheck. Seize the means of production.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The median sits around 80k these days. Everyone should be cheering, right?

What nobody wants to acknowledge is that the mode is still high 30's. Until that changes, we're leaving people behind.

[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

I mean yeah, lower inflation doesn't mean prices go back down, and wages didn't inflate for most people.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 11 points 2 weeks ago

CNBC can fuck all the way off with that brain dead journalism.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We were living paycheck to paycheck before that inflation boom too.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

But it's also because inflation is a measurement of velocity, not a static indicator. If you have a year with ten percent inflation, that doesn't go away without deflation happening and the finance industry would rather nuke the stock exchange than allow deflation.

Inflation is still happening just slower. So things are still getting more expensive and wages are not following. It's not rocket science unless the guy funding your research specifically asks you to never recommend any solutions that don't make rich people richer.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

They were doing that too begin with though?