this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
39 points (95.3% liked)

[MIGRATED TO DIFFERENT INSTANCE CHECK PIN POST] Internet is Beautiful

2003 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Internet is Beautiful Lemmy and Mbin community.

Find a cool or useful website on the internet. Share it here so others Lemmings can bookmark it too.

Rules

Related Communities

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
sag@lemm.ee
threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
m_f@midwest.social
m_f@lemm.ee
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
sag@ani.social
39
Math Encrypt: Convert Any Number to a Hard Math Equation (scientific.place)
submitted 8 months ago by sag@lemm.ee to c/internetisbeautiful@lemm.ee
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Thalfon@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

I tried punching in 243 and it gave me an equation that resolves to 235.

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=%28lim+%28%28x%5E2-100%29%2F%28x%2B10%29%29%2C+x-%3E13%29%5E5+-+%28%5Blim%28%28e%5E%288x%29-1%29%2Fx%29%2C+x-%3E0%5D+-+%5B%5Blim+%28%28x%5E2-36%29%2F%28x-6%29%29%2Cx-%3E-5%5D+-+lim%28cos%5E2+x+%2B+sin%5E2+x%29%2C+x-%3E36%5D%29

Tried it a few other times and it seems to sometimes like giving something that results in 3^5 (which would be 243 on its own) followed by subtracting a bit from it, which ends up making it the wrong answer. In the link above, it basically goes (3^5) - (8 - (1 - 1)), so if you only keep the first brackets it would be correct.

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 5 points 8 months ago

I think this would be a lot cooler if there was a complexity modificator to make the solution appear as cryptic as now, but easier to solve for average people.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Rdrr funny guy.

spoiler___ The sample problem resolves to 69

[–] sag@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Nice

[–] MrLLM@ani.social 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Huh, I don’t think they’ll be able to know what number it’s supposed to be…

[–] driving_crooner 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

0?

[–] MrLLM@ani.social 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Nope, it was supposed to be 69

[–] driving_crooner 1 points 8 months ago

I would bet my life The first limit evaluate to 0

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

SO many ads…

[–] sag@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Ad blocker is must in this era.

So many??

I only see one at bottom.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

iOS sucks. I’ve got Brave which seems to work better than most others available for this dreary OS, but I got flooded with ads.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You could sign up for windscribe custom VPN plan, with 3 locations at I think $3 a month, when connected to the VPN you also can supress ads at the vpn/DNS level. Raspberry Pi and piHole will do it too, in your home network.

[–] MrLLM@ani.social 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I’ve been using this one for a while, it has a premium subscription but I’ve been using the free tier with no issues so far.