this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
39 points (91.5% liked)

Games

16737 readers
496 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Make a 6/10 game

Add a cutscene that shuns the act of throwing babies like a football

Claim all criticism is from the pro-throwing baby crowd

[–] RabbitMix@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Its a really good game, but metacritic won't do the smart thing and just remove any review where the main complaint is "woke" "pronouns" or "DEI"

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good in what way? It looks pretty generic at best.

[–] RabbitMix@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

in the way that I'm enjoying my time with it a lot and will be sad when it's over. idk I'm not a reviewer, I just know what makes me happy.

[–] Melonpoly@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

It's great that it makes you happy, but that does not make the game objectively good.

[–] Alchalide@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I think you can look at it 2 ways. I think this game is reviewbombed into a positive score, as well as it being review bombed downwards.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is that really the smart thing?

I'm fairly confident that would be about as good for them as shooting themselves in the foot.

You have to realize what world you're living in. These people and their agreeing friends aren't just a loud minority, just yesterday they demonstrated something that really should have informed your worldview more than it seems to have, given what you suggest here. That kind of removal would be unpopular, a lot of people would drop Metacritic fast.

To an extent I agree with them, in that they ruined the tone of the game, but unlike these reviewers I personally think developers are allowed to make standalone slop. It doesn't ruin anything I've bought from them before.

Finally by all reasonable accounts it absolutely is a woke, pronoun-conscious, DEI focused game. Those words wouldn't even really be out of place if one showed up in a positive review.

You have to learn to think before you make yourself more unpopular.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What good do a lot of user ratings do anyone if it's just brigaded by people who haven't played the game and were told to be upset about it by some influencer who has far more of a political agenda than the thing they're upset about?

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You didn't read what I wrote.

You only saw the disagreement.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I did read what you wrote. I don't know how metacritic solves the problem without proof of ownership like Steam has, but there's a huge disparity between metacritic brigades and people who own the game. Searching for a few of those key words is going to be a quick way to filter for them, generally.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Yeah, the quick way to filter them is a quick way to piss off Metacritic users.

How the fuck can you claim to have read what I wrote?

That kind of removal would be unpopular, a lot of people would drop Metacritic fast.

[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

a lot of people would drop Metacritic fast.

Oh no, they lost a bunch of people who only joined to troll reviews? What a shame

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This is the casually dismissive attitude that got you the next 4 years. You should know how this would go, but you're apparently still in a bubble?

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know how I could have written what I did without reading what you wrote. I think it's just more of a damned if you do, damned if you don't thing. And no positive review would have those words in them, because they're not qualities that a fan of the game would notice (or even be able to define).

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So basically you think I'm wrong that it would be that unpopular of a decision.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Now you're not reading what I wrote.

Prew-nawns!!

[–] lohky@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I've watched some gameplay and dialogue sequences and it all seems so vanilla and boring.

Like Marvel movie tier writing and combat.