this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
166 points (98.8% liked)

World News

39019 readers
3653 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bookmeat@lemmy.world 74 points 6 days ago (1 children)

All these analysts trying to figure out how this tyrant who will be in control of all the Federal government can't do this or that because a piece of paper says so. SMH.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's not the piece of paper, it's the amount of people who have to go along with something for it to happen. A lot of his and his zealous proposals are wildly unpopular.

Also Trump is a raging narcissist. If the focus ends up on project 2025 and makes him look bad, he will ditch whatever that item is. So I guess pick your battles and make noise.

[–] Bookmeat@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

You're exactly correct. The law as it stands is irrelevant to what these analysts think. I'm not saying Trump can call every shot, but it doesn't really get any easier to change or skirt laws he dislikes. Anyone who leans on the "but the law says..." argument is praying.

[–] Oneser@lemm.ee 18 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Would it not be economic suicide to do so?

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 77 points 6 days ago

Like how slapping double digit tariffs on literally everything would be economic suicide?

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 60 points 6 days ago

Voting for Trump was economic suicide.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago

Everything he has proposed is economic suicide.

[–] yrmp@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

People don’t seem to understand that Trump is the Russians’ inside job.

The call is coming from inside of the house. The policies are meant to be bad on purpose. The people that destroy the country will be on planes to Moscow when all is said and done.

Russia won. The oligarchs won. We lost. That’s all there is to it.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Political too. And geostrategic, of course. But that seems to be very much en vogue these days.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Trump would be impeached if he tried. You think Raytheon and Boeing can't buy enough congressmen to impeach him?

[–] Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world 90 points 6 days ago (2 children)

He's been fucking impeached twice already.

How do you people have such short fucking memories?

Nothing sticks to this dirtbag. That's how he got that stupid nickname.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago

Ah, the irony of how poisonous Teflon actually turned out to be.

[–] August27th@lemmy.ca 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Trump would be impeached

Let's assume that happens. What would that do, exactly? Can you think of any precedent where something like that has happened before? What was the net effect?

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Are we still pretending that impeachment in the US is any kind of meaningful threat to a president?

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

If you understand it as a trial where a president who has done something wrong is held accountable according to the law, then no that's idealist nonsense.

If you understand it as a mechanism that allows 50+ senators to replace the president with the VP if they want to, yes.

[–] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Who would impeach him? Raytheon and Boeing will get money via DoD as usual

[–] nexusband@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

A lot less though. Keep in mind, Ukraine help is also a big plus in all the financial books, even though it looks like they just "get the money"...

[–] RecursiveParadox@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Um, you know those companies can sell weapons and craft to other countries right? Trump will still be happy for Europeans to buy weapons.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Oh, no, we're out of NATO.

Or at the least we'll have a CJCs that stops all NATO cooperation, so we're in in name only.

Who am I kidding, either the CJCs or SecDef WILL be Michael Flynn.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To the glee of the fascist dictator currently attempting Ukrainian genocide.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

All thanks to his friend, the US dictator elect