Aww look, Lil' Marco is all grown up now
this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
77 points (97.5% liked)
politics
19096 readers
3747 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
WHAAAAATTT?!
Rubio? Dang. That's a choice. There's Romney, Paul, Barrasso, and Cruz that are some heavy hitters on the Committee on Foreign Relations and he went with Rubio? I mean shit, Rand Paul is who I would think would slide the best into Trump's Sec. of State. There's likely no one for Sec. of State that's on Foreign Rel. that's been more meticulous about the southern border that him. Additionally, the man is an easy pick for if you wanted to have someone sign a giant check from the US Treasury to Israel in the amount of ALL dollars.
Rubio is a bit more slow paced. Don't get me wrong, he wants a wall just as much, but he'd likely slow walk it to allow it to gain heavy media traction. Paul would just be like "Give me some fucking bricks".
is viewed by State Department officials as unlikely to overly politicize the role
That is a massive understatement there.
All I have to say is color me surprised by the choice. I mean, obviously Trump is going to tell Romney to eat shit, but shit if Foreign Rel. is where Trump was going for Sec. of State, I would have surely thought Paul would be a a perfect fit to Trump's mannerisms.
Rubio is a Russian asset. Thats it. That’s why he was chosen.
So's Paul. Don't forget that he made a solo trip to Russia in August 2017 to hand deliver a letter from Trump to Putin.
Yes, a sitting US Senator was doing a job that the State Department ought to have been doing.
Is he? He was pretty hyped about how well Ukraine did in the early days of the conflict, actively tweeting about all the insane stuff that was going on. I think he was criticized for maybe speaking a little too openly about stuff that wasn't exactly public knowledge, but he didn't seem like a Russian asset from that perspective.
I would have just pegged him as another war hawk that probably uses an alt account on NCD. Maybe I missed something.
Libs just like to call people russian assets. It makes them feel like spies or something instead of just dorks.
Here's an article with some actual info: https://www.kyivpost.com/post/42107
Maybe Paul will be his Treasury secretary. Hah!
I thought he said he was draining the swamp?
He did say that.
Wait did you actually believe him?
People used to laugh when I said the state is just student council for violent adult babies.
What an absolute farce.
Fievel goes to the White House
he gonna name himself or junior the replacement.