this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
632 points (95.3% liked)

Political Memes

5446 readers
3286 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic political strategy

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 minutes ago (1 children)

Remember back in the past, when Democrats were communists and Republicans were social Democrats? Oh wait, that never happened, this graph is nonsense

[–] frazw@lemmy.world 0 points 5 minutes ago

This is recent history, not all history, and FYI it is a meme not a scientific study.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 2 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

This could mean that there’s room on the left for a brand new party.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 4 points 46 minutes ago

Only if America will implement proportional representation

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 2 points 55 minutes ago

There are plenty of people trying but it is clearly not working

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 2 points 43 minutes ago (1 children)

It could if we weren't locked into a two party system.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 1 points 33 minutes ago

I mean, if there ever was a time for a grass roots growing of a third party, it would be NOW, not a year before the election with Putin-stooge Jill Stein.

[–] USNWoodwork@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

This fails to recognize that for a very long time things trended left. I remember talking to someone in the 90s and we went down a list of major issues and the left had essentially won on all of them. Roe vs Wade EPA Gay Marriage Welfare Reform and Child Tax Credits

My hope for the Democratic party is that they go to a single issue for the next National election, and that issue should be Anti-trust/Breaking up monopolies

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 1 points 54 minutes ago

Things should be progressing no? that's the whole point of being the "progressive party"

[–] brianary@startrek.website 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

That's an important issue, but if Democrats ever see power again, it'll be important to focus on re-enfranchisement (RCV, instant runoff, or anything fairer than FPTP; NPVIC; national mail voting; mandatory voting), on judicial reform to undo the corruption and incompetence that has been packed there. Without those, keeping any gains will be impossible.

Then, triaging existential threats is critical, which will mean fighting climate change, investing in public transport (trains), and breaking up trusts will have to be pursued simultaneously. Stopping any support for genocide needs to happen as soon as possible.

There will be plenty more structural changes to fix beyond that: Protecting whistleblowers and protesters, improving FOIA, replacing norms with laws (Emoluments Clause enforcement, financial records disclosure, no insider trading for Congressmembers, &c), and all manner of civil rights protections and police reform.

After all that, it'll be time for the stuff I've been hoping for: nationalizing healthcare and Internet access, and copyright reform.

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 minutes ago

Sadly, support for genocide won't be an issue by the midterms.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

not saying i disagree, but people always link this article as though it even has a section on partisan politics. it doesn’t, or really even pose any evidence that suggests the effect applies to the overton window. would be curious if there are any sources that pose evidence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 107 points 1 day ago

Meet me in the middle, says the unjust man. You take a step towards him, he takes a step back. Meet me in the middle, says the unjust man.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

/genuine question, asides from the obvious of republicans adopting left policy, what would have to happen for another party switch to occur?

like, i know it happened once. wondering what circumstances and context brought that about and if that’s even a realistic framing to think about today’s world?

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

There is also the Whig party for reference. They were one of the two parties until they refused to take a meaningful stance on slavery. They were the 'bipartisanship states rights solves it' party versus the 'pro-slavery' party.

There is no longer a Whig party and the slavery party went to war over a decade or so after the anti slavery parry formed.

So there's that alternative to Party switch.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

I agree. I think we're at the stage where the Democrats are the Whig party. They aren't going to change, they need to be replaced with a true progressive party.

Assuming that we continue to be as much of a democracy as we were, now might be the time for that replacement to happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 24 points 21 hours ago

The Overton Window is set in an abandoned lot. The house burned down a long time ago.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 32 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

The rightward shift of the GOP and the tendency of the seemingly infinite number of spineless Dem careerist politicians to seek compromise is very real, but please remember the 90s and 2000s, everyone. They were not as rosy and left-wing as you remember; while not nearly enough, the Dems are notably more left than they were then.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›