this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
183 points (96.4% liked)

Videos

14343 readers
267 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 67 points 2 days ago

Use Firefox.

This is the easiest problem to solve.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This has been coming since they announced Manifest v3. Anyone paying any attention at all knew this was going to happen.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

and switched to Firefox if they weren't already using it

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 92 points 2 days ago (2 children)

New? This is years in the working.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Literally told people to expect this if they keep using chrome and now they are in disbelief, more so when I send them the screen cap of me telling them to expect it.

[–] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

But why would an ad company want to block ad blockers? That makes no sense...

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl -2 points 2 days ago
[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago

Switch to Firefox, be happy.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 54 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Who gives a fuck? Just stop using chrome

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

There was a time not too long ago where I would have just assumed a move this clearly douchey and against your customers' desires would lead to nothing but a complete evacuation of those customers, but I've seen this movie play out enough times to know that somehow, someway, this will work out just fine for them. People will complain, swallow it whole, keep on using it, and finally just forget about it.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

It turns out the majority of people are just really fuckin’ dumb.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

this stumps me, when an alternatice can be installed in 2 seconds like every other app

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Okay, thanks. I remember reading quite a bit about this but in another thread a while back, several people were recommending Brave. I was using it for a while and I do like the speed, especially on Android. I was using Firefox on both desktop and Androis but I think uBlock Origin on Firefox causes a 2-5 pause when accessing some websites. It's really weird and I haven't been able to figure it out.

Overall, I agree about Brave and the shady monetization stuff.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The fuck you mean “new”? They have been trying to force chromium based browsers on everyone in part for this exact reason

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] kn33@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago
[–] coffee_tacos@mander.xyz 22 points 2 days ago
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Imagine using you power to "vote for "/support/give power to a company who says it's gonna kill all ad-blockers to monopolise the ad market even further ... and then complain about the exact thing happening.

Using Chrome (or other Google products) is just supporting and enabling that.
If people didn't use it, none of it would have happened.

[–] 0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 10 points 2 days ago

LibreWolf

Mullvad

Two current best forks of FF for a discerning customer.

Add uBlock to hurt ad tech

[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

That's why I don't use chrome.

[–] Mim@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That alone would be why it's good if they had to sell it.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

The only issue with forcing them to sell it is Mozilla will lose most of its income stream. Hopfully selling it causes much branching making it harder to target firefox in making websites uncompatable.

[–] nicomachus@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

Chrome is shit. Never liked it and only use it at work.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago
[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

The amount of disconnect with reality in the comments on this is / will continue to be hilarious

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Brave Browser if you still want a Chromium based browser. Also ranks as one of the best privacy browsers

https://privacytests.org/

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 hours ago

Brave is malware that should never be used. If you need a Chromium based browser, Vivaldi is a good choice. Otherwise Firefox.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Brave has plenty of problems and chromium base is only one of them, here’s some easy examples from recent history:

https://www.androidpolice.com/2020/06/07/brave-browser-caught-adding-its-own-referral-codes-to-some-cryptcurrency-trading-sites/

The issue came to widespread attention yesterday, when Twitter user @Cryptonator1337 pointed out that Brave Browser auto-filled a referral code to the end of the web address when "binance.us" is typed into the address bar. Binance is a cryptocurrency trading website, and with that referral code, Brave Software could earn 20% from trading fees for every account created using the link.

https://cryptobriefing.com/basic-attention-token-rebounds-despite-brave-autofill-controversy/

  • Brave browser reportedly redirected its users to the company's own referral links when navigating to different platforms such as Binance, Coinbase, and others.
  • Following the incident, the price of Basic Attention Token plummeted over 6%. 
  • But over the last few hours, the bulls appear to have stepped in, signaling that BAT is poised for further gains.

Best case scenario Brave is difficult to fully trust, why go out of your way to use a browser that tries to monetize your usage?

While we’re at it fuck every chromium-based browser. Why help google conquer the internet that much faster? Because that’s how they attack unlock origin and such, that’s how they introduce lag and pauses for people visiting YouTube on non chromium browsers, etc.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How is uBO Lite different from regular uBO?

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

No permissions, unable to do some advanced blocking stuff, unable to pull an updated list of ad urls (which means you have to update the extension to get updated ad lists), and so on

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

(which means you have to update the extension to get updated ad lists)

Extensions get updated automatically, though, right?

yes, but ublock gets its blocklists from an external address, which cannot be done with manifest v3. and updating the extension is something that can take weeks until approved, while google could just outmaneuver ublock.

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Despite all the drawbacks, so far I don't notice a difference.

[–] zoostation@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The change hasn't even officially happened yet. Over time, following the changes, ad tech will get restructured to take advantage of the new limitations so ads can't be blocked. Nothing will change overnight.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago