this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
126 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3064 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So many Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania faces for leopard to eat.

Hope they enjoy the lower gas prices.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 2 hours ago

Exemptions will only be issued until after the cheques to trump tower have cleared.

It is going to be funny (not really, because only I will remember this) when the CPC, who made a big stink over the LPC not prosecuting SNC for bribing the son of the Libyan dictator to get a business deal done, begin directly bribing members of the Trump Administration and his family.

[–] TechAnon@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago

Ask yourself if this is good or bad for Elon.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 72 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

America’s top oil trade groups, meanwhile, said imposing the tariffs would be a mistake - exposing a rare moment of discord between the industry and Trump.

I want this to happen so bad. Please, Trump, stick to your guns. Fuck this shit up! It's the only way the idiots in this country will learn.

What am I saying, Americans are incapable of learning. You know what, do it anyway. Fuck the bozos!

[–] _chris@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

Artificially raise prices with tariffs for three years: “Look what impossible problems the democrats left us with!”

Take all those tariffs away in election year 2028 “We saved you! Only us! You’d better keep us in charge”

Who am I kidding, we won’t have any more elections.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Learn? They'll learn that prices go up because Biden was there and fucked things up before Trump took over, that's how their brain works.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago

You could have shortened this to:

"Trump good"

And it would have the same result, they don't need that much.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 24 points 17 hours ago

"look I know y'all said lower prices, but I think we can do better! Higher prices, for everyone and everything!"

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 31 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Albertans heavily cheered on Trump up here in Canada.

Ready the leopards, faces need eating.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 9 points 16 hours ago

Didn't you hear? The tariffs are Trudeau's fault! Why didn't he do more to keep the border secure?!?!?!

[–] LutefiskPizza@fedia.io 10 points 18 hours ago

Aldirtans do many stupid things. And fail to learn from them.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

"I Did This" stickers v2.0: Felony Boogaloo

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Saw a vid where someone has printed a bunch of "I did that" stickers with Trump on em

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 18 hours ago

Get your Trump "I did that" stickers ready

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

that cuntrag works for Russia, ffs.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

but genocide! /s

idiots are gonna idiot.

prepare for the worst folks. We've got four weeks to get whatever you need before the shit hits the fan.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

What's the running bet? Gas almost 5 bucks a gallon? That would be awesome.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

25% across the board on raw inputs would bring current $70 WTI barrels to $87.5, and we'll pretty solidly see a price floor of $4/gal from our current nation average around 3.20

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That's being extremely charitable. This gives them an excuse to raise prices, and I would be shocked if they didn't throw another 5 or 10% on top in the name of profits.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

That's why I called it a price floor accounting for solely the change in imported crude oil. Multiple inputs for gasoline (equipment, naptha, various hydrocarbon mixers, etc) also are imported and exported depending on market availability and will all cumulatively add to the price at the pump, which companies will absolutely add a profit kickback on top.

Markets are fucking weird though, they dont always react how you expect and those tariffs won't apply to the ~60% or so of our overall oil demand that can be covered with domestic sources (at least until that production begins to drop mid 2025), so we'll see. Wild fucking times ahead.

[–] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 7 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

There is one caveat to the tariffs not working.

They were fantastically effective against Canada when the US lumber lobby illegally attacked Canadian processed lumber.

The proceeds of the tariffs were funnelled back into the US companies that paid the import tariff, so the US did not suffer from the massive illegal tariffs applied, and the tariffs were not applied against the raw logs that they did want from Canada.

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

No matter how you got your lumber, the US companies still won.

And Stephen Harper/Pierre Poilievre won. They capitulated to the US and their base never called them on it.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

What was the illegal part?

Illegal as determined by all but one international trade tribunal, because it was claimed to be dumping, but the US had no proof, and Canada had proof to the contrary.

Also it was flagrantly against NAFTA.

[–] FarFarAway@startrek.website 2 points 15 hours ago

OK. I know this sounds ridiculous, but...what if this is all a secret agenda to prepare us for climate change? Make it too expensive to use gas or drive or buy stuff or buy food.

They slowly ween us off of our dependence on...everything, while making us think it was our idea. (Cause climate change doesn't exist) We would have to go back to living with nothing, poor, and growing our own food. Everyone that can't keep up is given a free meal and work...in jail.

I know, I know. I was just pretending there was a bit of some sort of humanity in this train wreck.