this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
534 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59675 readers
3281 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm just not interested in hearing what bullshit FAANG is up to, I want to talk about linux kernel patches and raspberry pi revisions and maybe hear what people other than grifters are doing with neural networks.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

You just need a mod team willing to enforce those rules.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Same question. I kinda hoped it would be here, but many lemmy communities are just reddit with a better UI. Lots of good links in this thread tho!

[–] Lydia_K@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 16 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 9 hours ago

Would be nice to have more communities that just autopublish all articles published by specific sites

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 86 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

IMHO, this community should be about technology. Novel inventions. Interesting or creative applications. Discoveries. Dangers, advances, impacts, experiments, tutorials, etc.

Instead, it's overrun with stock market and business news having no more to do with technology than CEOs of wood pulp factories have to do with literature.

I wish Rule 2 was phrased in a way that clearly excludes the latter, and enforced.

[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Beautifully phrased. Make science about science again, not about flash in the pan personalities.

[–] hiramfromthechi@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

This is specific to open source, but perhaps a good starting point: https://opensourcely.org/

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 96 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Every tech community devolves into Musk/Microsoft/Linux drama pretty quickly. It's pathetic.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 14 points 22 hours ago

Only if moderators don't moderate. I don't know what it is about tech communities, but it always seems to happen with these more than others.

[–] WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (5 children)

That's because tech peaked a while back. Tech news is basically about the next hustle to keep the funding coming in while producing nothing truly useful.

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

Technology did not peak. "News" peaked. We are definitely on a downhill slope for news.

Actual Journalism is much more rare than it needs to be.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, there's rarely new tech most people care about, just consumer product updates.

I work almost exclusively with early stage companies with major innovation and patents. APIs, InfoSec, etc aren't sexy enough to make these communities.

[–] babybus@sh.itjust.works 20 points 19 hours ago

"Elon Musk said that he eats babies" is not tech news regardless of whether tech peaked or not.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Technically absolutely did not peak a while back.
Journalism online is just full of a lot of dumb bullshit.

[–] actually@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

Yes, what we have here in this thread is a reaction to the collapse of tech news.

It’s still exponentially growing in all fields with tens of millions of brilliant technical and scientific people. It’s just that the reporting of it has collapsed due to .. gasp.. technology advancement which upset the economic model which supported reporting and well written articles.

That, and the fact things are advancing so fast nobody a clue what is going on outside their specific interests

Tech is still producing lots of useful stuff. AI for example can actually be very useful. It's just not as generalist as the marketers would have us believe. For specific targeted tasks, it can be amazing.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Good post. I have 3 new subs now thanks to the comments :D

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’ve wanted something like that as well. I’m currently playing around with BlueSky feeds to get streams of science and technology content. Lemmy’s technology communities are often tech drama and or Linux stuff, and miss out on other things that are happening in the industry.

[–] darkstar@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

Ah please could you post some recommendations on who to follow on Bluesky?

[–] Iapar@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago

If you put it into a starter pack, let me know.

[–] vulture_god@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Check out 404 media! I'm a big supporter of independent media, but there's been a real lack of high quality, competent tech journalism for the last few years.

They launched in the last few months and I've been pretty impressed with their coverage so far.

Even their coverage though could be called at the intersection of current events <> technology. When I want pure tech news, I usually watch YouTube channels that specialize in related topics ( like Asionometry for silicon design or Dave2d for device reviews).

[–] ComradeMiao@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks for explaining them! I’ve seen links there without knowing about it

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Same here. I've just gone through their feed and I recognize a good portion of the headlines.

[–] TheEntity@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 1 points 7 hours ago

A blog post I wrote got shared there a while back, but I did not ask for an invite back then. 2 years later, and I don't feel legitimate to ask for an invite anymore

[–] rwdf@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I concur. It's like HN but with less AI/VC BS.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Little too programming focused though, not much tech news

[–] redshift@lemmy.ml 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Do you know if they have any plan to stop requiring invites? I've been interested for many years, but the invite system rubs me the wrong way.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 1 points 7 hours ago

There's a mastodon bot... but it's one-way of course.

[–] TheEntity@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I don't think so. It's probably what keeps it small and more personal. There is also the notion of responsibility: if a person I invite causes trouble, it's potentially on me. Maybe not on the first infraction, but if one invites 20 spammers/cryptobros/venturecapitalists, it's reasonable to block the inviter too.

I'm not arguing one way or another (that's not my decision anyway), but I can understand why they do this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I use this community for that: !tech@programming.dev

The rules seem to be aligned with what you're looking for.

Plus other communities on that instance depending on what you're interested in.

Then there are feeds like !hackernews@lemmit.online to keep up with content on other sites. There are lots of RSS feed communities through the https://rss.ponder.cat/communities instance

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 8 hours ago

Hacker news is empty for me..?

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 9 hours ago

Warning: those mods are trigger happy and abuse their rights (eg by banning content from Foss projects)

[–] Static_Rocket@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I like phoronix.com but don't bother reading the article comments.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Or sometimes do read the comments as a reminder on why you shouldn't.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Check out hackaday maybe? It’s primarily hobbyist stuff, but they’ve been peppering in some original pieces about tech innovations and trends.

At the very least, nobody is trying to sell you anything.

[–] Addv4@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Phys.org or maybe nature? They're mostly just seem to be reposts of journals or Nature articles, but they don't usually have drama and can often be rather interesting. They aren't necessarily about technology, just scientific advances which is a nice change from all of the enshitification news that almost any tech hub is blaring.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 3 points 20 hours ago

Link - !hackaday@rss.ponder.cat

Fuck knows why Lemmy doesn't link to both the same way, seems daft

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

LWN is good for Linux kernel related content.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you don't want drama, then Torvalds' work might not be the best project to follow

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Linux drama good drama IMO

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I do enjoy some crusty C developers arguing with rusty not-C developers every once in a while.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chef_Boyargee@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Might scope out the forums and comments sections at Ars Technica. There’s a wealth of information from a ton of the regulars.

[–] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Hacker News is probably your best bet as long as you don't go too deep in the comments

[–] gaterush@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Hacker news still going strong, you get the drama stories here and there but the focus is on the technology

load more comments
view more: next ›