this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
647 points (97.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

32964 readers
481 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rokin@lemm.ee 21 points 2 years ago

One of my favorites

[–] pizzaiolo@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This of course ignores all the other times a new common standard succeeded

[–] Vithar@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Doesn't that almost always require a significant government intervention/regulation.

[–] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Fortunately, the charging one has been solved now that we've all standardized on mini-USB. Or is it micro-USB? Shit.

[–] Koen967@feddit.nl 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wasn't the standard USB-C? Maybe we should just create the Universal USB, the U-USB.

[–] rokejulianlockhart@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

It's USB-C.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] siriusmart@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago

i saw it on the cumcord website (yes its a real serious project)

[–] vd1n@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I finally got a proper USB 3.012542 cable.

[–] crusty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

It's bad when the actual naming scheme is more ridiculous. See USB 3.2 gen 2x1. Hopefully usb 4 simplifies things, but let's be honest, it probably won't...

[–] progenyofthestars@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Source: https://xkcd.com/927/.

Not posting with alternative text is like missing half of the xkcd.

[–] DeflectedBullhorn@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Wow, somehow this escaped me all these years. I feel like I’ve got a bunch of fresh XKCD to read now.

For the uneducated: On a mobile browser you just press and hold the comic (long tap). On a computer you hover over the image and the alt text will appear next to the cursor.

The alt text in this one was:

spoilerFortunately, the charging one has been solved now that we've all standardized on mini-USB. Or is it micro-USB? Shit.

[–] rokejulianlockhart@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

You should have just linked to the page. It would have embedded the image, right?

[–] Oakholm@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Ahh this was the one they talked about on the WAN show

[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is the reason I was super hyped by the synergy of the fediverse, all the support and use of activity pub. And god I hope Facebook doesn't ruin it. This community has grown so rapidly and organically, I just wanna see it continue to thrive.

[–] MR_@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 years ago

And god I hope Facebook doesn’t ruin it.

How could it? I think FB is more of a threat to Mastodon than it will be to Lemmy, no?

[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, in such a situation you should always try to compare the standards, look at the userbases and suddenly there are only very few that actually make sense. If everyone just does this, one standard will eventually crystalise as the one to use (or at least depending on the situation). Character encoding is an interesting example, because nowadays (almost) everything just uses UTF-8, despite there having been many.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 2 points 2 years ago

UTF-8 is absolutely magical in how it's backwards compatible with ASCII. Windows still uses UTF-16 which makes supporting Unicode filenames and stuff a huge pain compared to linux. At least pretty much the entire web is UTF-8.

[–] h_a_r_u_k_i@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Python packaging in a nutshell.

[–] pazukaza@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

In how many ways can you package a python?

Just tie a knot with it and throw it in a bucket.

[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, thats the positive thing.

I don't want a single application that just works for a few cases but doesn't work for tons of other cases. With such a world we would have a Windows OS where you need to use Face-ID for everything you want to use and sometimes just crashes and restricts the usage of something simple stupid because you don't have the magical Windows Battlepass or smth.

load more comments
view more: next ›