this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
190 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2449 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Little will change at Fox News under new leadership, analysts say, as Republicans can rely on yet more outrage and division

The abrupt uncoupling of the Republican kingmaker Rupert Murdoch from his Fox News empire may have represented a ground shift in the media landscape in the US, but politically at least, very little is likely to change, analysts say.

That could be good news for those on the right of the Republican party, who can expect the network to head into the 2024 presidential election – even without its long-time figurehead – continuing to amplify the worst of the political bias and disinformation upon which it made its name.

“They’re going to continue the same business formula, which is whipping up hysteria around manufactured crises. They’ll continue to foster outrage and division, and gin up support for conservative causes. I don’t see any of that changing dramatically anytime soon,” said Victor Pickard, professor of media policy and political economy at University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg school for communication.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

His son, who is taking over, is even more of a shithead than Rupert.

This is not a change, just a changing of the guard.

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact that after all these years, after so much damage his media empire has created, various governments around the world couldn't find something to arrest him on is beyond frustrating.

[–] FlaminGoku@reddthat.com 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's because they are complicit.

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Or the more likely answer is that they have always hidden behind Free Speech laws. They have known to keep their nose clean because if they did do anything illegal, they would get the book thrown at them.

Why do something illegal, when bamboozled idiots are freely throwing money at you?

It's like the old mafia cliché. These mob bosses used to work in the underground to launder money and were always afraid of getting caught by the law, but their kids got smart and simply went into big business to do it legally and out in the open.

[–] Armen12@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He renounced his Aus citizenship 40 years ago and became an American.

He had to do this to buy Fox. For the entire existence of Fox news, R Murdoch has been American.

He is as American as any other naturalised immigrant.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That means he was 52, so it's not like someone who moved when they were 12...

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

He became American because America had lax enough regulations for him to take advantage of. Broken systems are ripe for exploitation.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

So...thanks America!!!

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, Reagan destroyed it to the cheers of the degenerate fascists. I was here, I was 8.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, the fascists swep under the rug in the civil war. Surprise, they didn't magically disappear.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, I have been to the south, thanks.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The story is about Fox...

For the entire existence of Fox news, R Murdoch has been American.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel that perhaps his personality and life were shaped by events prior to when he was 52.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, there's evil capitalists everywhere, but America gives them the means to thrive.

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

australia does also, so okay.

[–] Cabrio@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Then why did they go to America? To not use your lax system with access to hundreds of millions more people to exploit to make them billionaires?

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I’m not sure what that question entirely means, but yes. The population of australia is about half of merely California.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The abrupt uncoupling of the Republican kingmaker Rupert Murdoch from his Fox News empire may have represented a ground shift in the media landscape in the US, but politically at least, very little is likely to change, analysts say.

That could be good news for those on the right of the Republican party, who can expect the network to head into the 2024 presidential election – even without its long-time figurehead – continuing to amplify the worst of the political bias and disinformation upon which it made its name.

Pickard’s view is shared by other analysts, who see a “business as usual” approach as the network continues to deal with the fallout from the $787.5m settlement with Dominion Voting Systems for peddling Donald Trump’s big lie that the 2020 election was stolen.

That episode cost Fox its most-watched rightwing host, Tucker Carlson, who left in April after pushing the worst of the falsehoods, and complaining he was fired as part of the settlement.

Padden, who gave testimony in the Dominion case, is one of three former senior Fox executives who have become vocal critics of Murdoch and the network, writing in a blog post earlier this year that they regretted their defense of the channel.

Pickard, meanwhile, said the tried and tested political playbook that Fox has followed for so long will continue to encourage Republican politicians, and help the network fend off the rise of fledgling channels seeking a greater slice of conservative and rightwing viewership.


The original article contains 960 words, the summary contains 247 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

He’s a symptom, but he was also one of the root causes, in terms of what made the Fox-style “news” successful.