322
submitted 1 year ago by aCosmicWave@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

For me it is Cellular Automata, and more precisely the Game of Life.

Imagine a giant Excel spreadsheet where the cells are randomly chosen to be either "alive" or "dead". Each cell then follows a handful of simple rules.

For example, if a cell is "alive" but has less than 2 "alive" neighbors it "dies" by under-population. If the cell is "alive" and has more than three "alive" neighbors it "dies" from over-population, etc.

Then you sit back and just watch things play out. It turns out that these basic rules at the individual level lead to incredibly complex behaviors at the community level when you zoom out.

It kinda, sorta, maybe resembles... life.

There is colonization, reproduction, evolution, and sometimes even space flight!

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] distractedcactus@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Several things are regularly in my "ponder and wonder" list, the most recent being:

  • Chaos theory
  • Higher dimensions (>4)
  • The actual scale of space versus our normal human scale
  • The idea of social/societal evolution (how can we be better together as a species)

I can get lost for a while in any of these topics.

[-] voodooattack@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The incessant idea that I get when I read about quantum physics: with no observers and nothing to interact with/measure it, was the universe itself in superposition during the Big Bang? If so, did the wave function even collapse or are we just one of the possible outcomes inside of it?

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

An observer is not required for something to exist. You are misunderstanding. In quantum physics observers affect the thing they observe. That's it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] needthosepylons@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Alright, thanks to this comment section, I now need years of free times because it's all so fascinating I need to learn about all this!

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago
[-] Davel23@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

You might want to check out the novel Bloom by Wil McCarthy. It uses Conway's Game of Life and other cellular automata to illustrate several plot points.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Djh8878@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

What are some other rules to the excel example you gave, kinda want to try programming something like this to see how it’d play out

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 1 year ago

Just look up "The Game of Life." It's not really a spread sheet, that's simply how it's displayed (grids of pixels that are either living, dead, or food) and it just kinda simulates an ecosystem in the most very, very basic of ways. All you can do to influence the game is change what a grid contains, with the goal (if you can say it has any) of keeping a sustainable system going.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bergsons theory of mind. I wish i understood it enough to put a tldr, but its complex and has been misunderstood.

Heres another one. Michael behe's mousetrap. He likens cellular structure as a mousetrap, with every piece forming a necesesary part, and without any one part it ceases to function.

Back when i was a creationist christian and didnt accept evolution as fact, he was a hero. Endogenous retroviral dna put that all to rest. Except maybe not.

The counter arguments were that other structures could form over time to create the minimalist structures we see today, like using scaffolding to construct a self sustaining roman bridge or replacing the wooden base of the mousetrap with the floor. Obviously behe is mistaken.

But he claims not, that he doesnt argue that variants of mousetraps can't exist. He argues that all exist without scaffolding. We dont see cellular structures with unnecessary parts that can be acted upon by evolution. Everything already is the end product after evolution has selected away the unnecessary parts. So how can evolution be happening the way its described? We just go between different end products. Theres no structures still with scaffolding.

This keeps me up at night. Maybe theres more to evolution that we dont know yet.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
322 points (96.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43781 readers
890 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS