50
submitted 1 year ago by otter@lemmy.ca to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
all 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Do we really need ‘taken’ in quotes? I’m pretty sure everyone knows by now that stealing data doesn’t actually remove the data, and that identity theft doesn’t mean you no longer have a name.

[-] zeps@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

It’s in quotes because they’re quoting this page https://www.bornincident.ca/

[-] LeaveITtoThePros@group.lt 6 points 1 year ago

Do you think people would like to use bridges built by a company that claims it has built dozens of bridges using "methods that have been scrutinized by reputable engineering firms" but also "cannot be disclosed as that would reveal trade secrets"? No?

I will never understand why public infrastructure IT is not done openly with established methods and (free) software, instead of buying hidden, proprietary boxes that always turn out to have massive flaws.

[-] spudwart@spudwart.com 2 points 1 year ago

The difference is social precedent.

The fight for transparency when computers were young either failed or wasn’t present at all.

Now we’re left with the more difficult issue of actually trying to convince people that this is necessary.

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
50 points (98.1% liked)

Privacy

31292 readers
869 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS