[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

If it's easy enough to actually steal, everyone does it. It's human nature, we're greedy by nature.

[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, it sure as hell isn't 16, so yeah, in that case I would put the closest one as the answer as well, 13.

[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not an equation, it's simple math, like one used in a grocery store. You have 2 apples and then you pick up 4 more pairs of apples, how many apples you got?

As I said, it's not quantum mechanics, it's basic simple math.

I bet your alarm clock app also uses simple math problems like this one. It's expected for a grown up or a teenager to be able to solve this, that is why they put it on alarm clock app. It's not something that's meant to be easily forgotten. That is why you learn these things when you're very young, so they stick with you for the rest of your life. But from the answers, it's easy to notice that most have never even learned this in the first place, at all. Why? Your guess is as good as mine 🤷.

[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago
[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

It's moneeeyy. That's all there is to it, money. They finally have an easy way to control what you can or can't do with the things that (at least on paper) you own.

I just knew this was gonna happen... I warned about these things ever since music/movie subscriptions became a thing. You don't own a copy of what you (allegidly) bought, thus, it's not yours.

Now, you do own the thing... at least on paper, but you can't do much with it unless you pay extra cash to the one who sold it to you, so it can... you know, do the things it's supposed to do. It's basically extortion, no matter how you slice it. It's malware, period.

[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

You learn these things in 1st, 2nd grade. This is not quantum mechanics, this is simple basic math.

[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

always use parentheses to denote order, there are no implied parentheses

I completely agree on this, and yes, this is what I always do, cuz... well, we're human, we make mistakes, parentheses makes things easily visible, thus cutting down on mistakes.

Still, I do know operation order, as a rule I mean. In simple calcs like these, making a mistake is almost impossible. Thus, people that answered 16 probably just don't know the order... that is something you learn in 1st, 2nd grade, it's not quantum mechanics we're talking about here.

lazy mfs from centuries ago who were mortified by the thought of having to write ( and ) too much (lord what i wouldn’t give to hop in a time machine and show them lisp) should not be dictating our mathematical notation in this century.

We only do that cuz we're not sure how the compiler will interpret the operation order, and there's waaaay too many versions and different languages to actually remember how each of them interprets math operation order. So, we do a safe bet, put parentheses on everything. Hell, I do it as well, I just can't be bothered to remember if C interprets it like this, Python like that, Rust like... god knows what. They should, in theory, know math operation order, but let's face it, we all do it cuz we've been faced with bugs that are a direct result of the compiler not intepreting things as it should.

That being said, yes, I do agree that prentheses on everything, even math on paper, is the way to go. Plus, even people that don't know operation order, will learn it a lot qucker if you just show them how easy things become once you start using prentheses.

[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I know about that too, but I thought ot was only local to my country, lol 😂. Guess not.

[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

There is no choice, so it has to rock 🤷.

There is Servo, but no one seems to care much about it.

[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

That has nothing to do with science and everything to do with human traits.

[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Science kinda gave up cuz there is no way to change or reverse it in the current socio-economic system. It doesn't take into account the economic concepts of nature.

[-] 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml 62 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sadly, this is actually true, people actually don't know simple math and operation order.

And they ask me why I hold such low expectations for the future 🤦.

9
submitted 1 year ago by 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
146
Yep, would do the same (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
6
Interesting artwork (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 1 year ago by 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
358
Other "people" (lemmy.fmhy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
60
submitted 1 year ago by 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
13
Illuminated sobbing (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 1 year ago by 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
3
He's right (lemmy.fmhy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml

view more: ‹ prev next ›

0x4E4F

joined 1 year ago