[-] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 1 points 1 year ago

This is the way.

[-] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 1 year ago

A fake taxi like they say.

[-] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 4 points 1 year ago

But few can be relocked.

[-] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 1 year ago

If you are on Android I recommend NZB360 as companion app. It's freaking awesome.

[-] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 3 points 1 year ago

Wow, thanks for that.

[-] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 1 year ago
[-] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes ofc they can. The Wireguard protocol is not designed to be hidden.

Interesting read: https://www.ntkernel.com/how-to-bypass-egypts-wireguard-ban/

[-] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 5 points 1 year ago

Yes there is a difference between https traffic.

[-] AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah a fork, it's not the same dev.

430
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu to c/reddit@lemmy.world

Lemmy: "that is a fair point"

Reddit: "you fucking moron"

12
Hide Lemmy UI behind VPN? (lemmy.ronsmans.eu)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by AES@lemmy.ronsmans.eu to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

I have set up a small Lemmy instance (Docker + NPM) for testing purposes, and I was wondering if it is possible to only expose the activitypub to the internet and hide the Lemmy UI behind my personal wireguard VPN. So the UI is only accessible on the local LAN.

view more: next ›

AES

joined 1 year ago