maybe like white on white or green text on green background could be alternate choices. or like an option to only show half the letters. Those would be challenging too. Tho the black text on black background is a start. Maybe like 1/3 of the time needlessly jumble up all the letters too. Anyway, just ideas. the black on black is good enough so far tho for unexpected xtra challenge.
o that's cool. checked the error message today and there was more info which pinpointed the offending code. Was my fault and had to do with getting an element by id when the element had been created with a plugin (requires waiting like a second so the plugin can be loaded, which i hadn't done). One thing if this is an upgrade of errordescriptions is black text on black background is hard to see :)
ty!
pretty sure i didnt do anything so my guess is something new u implemented
really cool idea.
SERVERS OVERRUN WITH DINOSAURS. I DONT KNOW HOW LONG THIS MESSAGING NETWORK WILL STAY UP. MASSIVE T-REXS INBOUND. SEND H--- signal cuts out
and then they spit on it
After trillIons of years of it working errorlessly, edits to a custom T2I tonight caused me to get this error even tho my audio plugin was written with an eventlistener for click identically to how the Perchance Audio Plugin suggested script does.
I'm not sure why the error and I think it doesn't matter. What matters is I solved it with this:
so my code now is window.addEventListener("click", function(){if(navigator.userActivation.isActive && etc etc and it no longer bugs because it checks whether the user counts as active.
Whatever fringe scenario was causing mine to bug (a programmatic click perhaps?) would I'm sure also have happened with https://perchance.org/background-audio-plugin, and since I just solved mine with this nice little line, I am suggesting navigator.userActivation.isActive for https://perchance.org/background-audio-plugin too (to preemptively not have anyone encounter this bug).
thank you! :)
It isnt an admin deleting them since it is happening on starlitsky too and I haven't set admins. Anything I type disappears.
Also here is me responding to glass, screenshotting, refreshing, screenshotting and you can see the comment is gone.
nothing i have typed today nor yesterday is there
ok so then i got one with prompt ((Starlit Sky)) and saved it to gallery and the prompt was different, as u can read about in other replies. BUT WHY IM PINGING U IS ((Starlit Sky)) just did it again maybe 12 images later (edit: just got it a third time same prompt)
This one tho is not able to save to gallery, i guess cuz the other one i just put in the gallery
hopefully among these pics is your solution
edit: this is what did it twice in less than 50 imgs. Prompt ((Starlit Sky)) on style Dreamlike
edit: and another. slightly different and able to also go in gallery. Again idk where the prompt in info is from and idk who Pevita Pearce is who is mentioned in the prompt.
apparently Dreamlike with ((Starlit Sky)) is the way to reliably generate these and this combo results in this lineperson apparently
just looked at the info of the recent one now that it's in gallery and the prompt is entirely different from what it actually was and, in fact, nothing on Beautiful People generates a prompt like what It says, which is: "beautiful flat-style logo design depicting A colorful picture of a red, silver and white music background and colorful musical note , creative flat-style logo design, trending on dribbble, featured on behance, portfolio piece, minimal flat design, breathtaking graphic design, 8k, high resolution vector logo, plain background, amazingly beautiful logo design, winner of best logo award"
i had just typed ((Starlit Sky)) and didnt save the rest of the prompt i actually used.
apparently no to reproducing. just generated 50+ images with same settings and did not trigger it
@Perchance, looking at the TextToImage plugin page again today the wrongness of the line 'the same seed generates the exact same picture' is sort of jarring since nothing else on the page is false nor misleading (that i kno of).
for those of you who dont know, the same seed generates a variety of similar pictures.
i think the suggestion itself is not nsfw so it shouldn't be tagged nsfw. Anyway, I have noticed trillions of times now that there is an everpresent issue among people trying to generate nsfw images that are not specifically Anthro nor Anime that the HD and Realistic model or models seem badly or not trained on NSFW content. It is a question I and probably everyone with an ai art generator has had asked of us. Also, tons of people generate NSFW images. I believe, as far as models perchance text-to-image could have, realistic nsfw is the one that currently is the biggest missing model that, if present, would appeal to most people.
Someone on the chat of generators page at 1:14am today asked: "How do I find roleplays here? I find the generator overwhelming but if I go to search it just takes me to google. I assumed creations would show me like a.i people have already made"
I remember a while ago Perchance saying Findability could be improved. I agree and had been thinking maybe have a community event of everyone suggest stuff for 'generator finding' and for a while dabbled in recording which generators passed thru the Generators page that I thought people really cared about and were following up on and making a personally curated list, which I know many others have occasionally thought similarly and tried.
But none of that is really a concrete followable step by step improvement. Tonight tho, with that comment, here is one: Make the Search feature a real feature.
Right now it DOES feel 'underwhelming' in that someone clicks Search at the top of the Generator's page, and then it is 'surprisingly disappointing' when it does not really search through generators, but opens up a google with a specific search term. So here is a concrete suggestion as to improving findability while also pulling up something that has fallen behind in quality compared to everything around it: Upgrade Search Function on Generators Page. Make the search a real thing :)
Tho all the stickied things on the generator page are cool, I personally believe a single t2i generator blows them all out of the water because anyone can open up a t2i generator, see how it is written, think "i can do this", and start their coding journey, from wherever they are, in a fun way. Glad you are making things 'on our level' with the same plugins we have access to and as feedback for you and all the experienced devs you would like building things, it's to get creations in to a t2ilike format so further growth, from and for other people, can happen. Otherwise they are just unrepeatable curiosities. Just my unstoppably honest opinion :) sorry :)