[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

As an asshole that deserves the highest price hahahaha

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Sure, and that’s meaningful, but the problem is that many articles are getting major details and entire concepts wrong and publishing statements that are so inaccurate that it feels like bullshit.

Like the advertising counter is nowhere near how it’s been represented over and over in various unknown blogs.

Very much has the feel of a FUD campaign

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago

So THIS is why all the Firefox hit pieces have been surfacing recently….

Suddenly the picture becomes clearer lol.

I’m not surprised, they have been threatening this for awhile, put the timing of the hit pieces, and then this….. answers a lot of questions

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago

Continuous Mozilla hit pieces coming out….

I wonder which company motivated only by greed and the fact that their entire business model is “obliterating your privacy” is behind them

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yep, but we can’t afford to “not compete”

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

It doesn’t matter.

The ultimate utility of the ai and the threat that it poses if the west falls behind in ai research, is too great to allow copyright laws to get in the way.

So either they’ll say that the law doesn’t apply or they’ll make new laws.

Pandora’s box has been opened and we can’t go back.

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 52 points 2 weeks ago

Gotta pay the bills somehow, and I’m just happy they care about privacy.

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

It’s like the worst case of broken window fallacy lol.

He’s just made himself poorer.

Like the money would have done more good if he’d donated it.

But I guess that his actual goal was to get attention, since that’s the currency of the day….. and the worst part is that it was amazingly successful.

Like he couldn’t have spent a better $4000 anywhere to get this kind of publicity.

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

I’ve done both, it’s just a rarity to have someone experienced enough in both to be able to cross the lines.

Those are your gems and they’ll stick around as long as you pay them decently.

Hard to find.

Because the problem is that you need

  1. A developer
  2. A systems guy
  3. A social and great personality

The job is hard to hire for because those 3 in combo is rare. Many developers and systems guys have prickly personalities or specialise in their favourite part of it.

Devops spent have the option of prickly personalities because you have to deal with so many people outside your team that are prickly and that you have to sometimes give bad news to….

Eventually they’ll all be mad at you for SOMETHING….. and you have to let it slide. You have to take their anger and not take it personally…. That’s hard for most people, let alone tech workers that grew up idolising Linus torvalds, or Sheldon cooper and their “I’m so smart that I don’t need to be nice” attitudes.

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

As a devops manager that’s been both, it depends on the group. Ideally a devops group has a few former devs and a few former systems guys.

Honestly, the best devops teams have at least one guy that’s a liaison with IT who is primarily a systems guy but reports to both systems and devops. Why?

It gets you priority IT tickets and access while systems trusts him to do it right. He’s like the crux of every good devops team. He’s an IT hire paid for by the devops team budget as an offering in exchange for priority tickets.

But in general, you’re absolutely right.

12
submitted 11 months ago by ArbiterXero@lemmy.world to c/adhd@lemmy.world

Everyone I know that likes orange pop is kinda adhd, it just feels like the flavour of kids who can’t sit still, thoughts?

view more: next ›

ArbiterXero

joined 1 year ago