That's fine. Autocannibalism is generally frowned upon.
That's not how science generally works. It's not up to others to disprove your results. It's up to you to prove results to them.
You generally do this by very carefully explaining what you did and what the results where. Then others can follow your instructions and get the same results.
If they don't get the same results you haven't proven anything.
This might be one of the hardest things as a parent. To give them a safe and nurturing environment without letting your preconceptions limiting what they can be. I'm not sure if it something that can actually be done but we can aspire to do it.
I think we can pretty safely say it's not number 2. From what I found here transfem individuals slightly out number transmasc individuals and both out number 'gender nonconforming' individuals.
Of the 1.3 million adults who identify as transgender, 38.5% (515,200) are transgender women, 35.9% (480,000) are transgender men, and 25.6% (341,800) reported they are gender nonconforming
So more transfem individuals but not in the amount to explain the observed proportions in egg_irl.
I think you mean RTFM. But in this case it's WTFM so I can RTFM.
Running through Google translate and reading the article
An experimental team from Anhui has worked for more than ten hours and is trying to reproduce the results. They updated the latest progress tens of minutes ago. The results will come out in about three days. Perhaps soon, we will be able to witness the gold content of room temperature superconductivity.
It seems they are in the middle of replicating the results. Not that they have already completed replicated the results.
The actual article title is:
The first room-temperature and atmospheric-pressure superconductor has sparked global enthusiasm, and tens of thousands of people are watching the progress of the Chinese team's reappearance
when I translated it.
Going off this India traffic police site same as a white curb. High visibility marking the edge of the road.
When do I get to say “bad girl” 😶
My thoughts: Good comment. Plays into sub/bottom play a lot of tranfems are into. Ties into good girl pet play post.
When you have their consent My thoughts: Good response. Consent is the corner stone of all relationships.
Also, why do you assume that I am a rapist by default?
My thoughts: What the hell is this non-sequitur coming from. Why are they so defensive. Have they been creepy in the past and been called a rapist in order to have that be their first response?
Also, why do you assume that I am a rapist by default?
No one did? But you are making a compelling case now.
If he had a choice between good option A or bad option B, he would choose good option A.
Image description: Cat girl receiving head pats. She is saying "meow...". There is small text over her ear that says "*Secretly likes it*".
Top text. Girls go to college to get more knowledge
Bottom text: Boys go to college to become girls
Image description:
Image containing two blocks of text. One block of text takes up the top of the image. The second boock takes up the bottom of the image but has a thinking emoji with the head replaced with an egg in the trans flag color taking up the left quarter of the space available.
Top text: I'm not trans or anything I just want what ever wants:
Bottom text: To transition in order to alleviate my gender dysphoria
Alt text
Template: you guys are getting paid?
Top text: "Talking to cis people:"
Bottom text: "You guys are fine with your assigned gender?"
Yes. Reject the X and Y binary. You can use any variable name you want or even no variables all together.