Chiral

joined 7 months ago
[–] Chiral@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Great point, it's not so clear cut of a lead. 14900K wins in price, but I haven't factored in the cost of the mobo that might even out the total cost.

A case like Silverstone Alta G1M would let me fit a 360mm water cooler in there, but the build is starting to get larger and larger :P A lower TDP would need smaller coolers and fit smaller cases like you said.

I can fabricate a handle for it, and I'm considering perhaps smaller cases that I could stuff a 360mm cooler into where a GPU would be. e.g. Mechanic Master C30pro (aside from the glass...). As long as the case can handle a long enough GPU, it would fit a 360mm radiator (~400mm long) and I could bolt it to the side panel and cut some ventilation. Sadly many of the cases out there seem to be tempered glass side panels... can't cut/drill that!

[–] Chiral@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah, you're right. Threadrippers are definitely not the right approach here.

I'm seeing relatively the same multithreaded performance from a i9 14900K as a Ryzen 9 7950X and the 14900K has a solidly higher single-threaded performance according to cpubenchmark.net

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html

https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html#desktop-thread

[–] Chiral@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Great website...

Wouldn't a mobo advertise that its VRMs would support sustained 253W as a selling point? It was my understanding that AMD couldn't touch Intel's single-threaded performance. ST performance isn't the be-all-end-all performance metric, but it seems relatively important for my use.

You've got me looking at Threadrippers now and... 350W TDP?!?!?

[–] Chiral@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

$500 on RAM seems OK, good to know it's a bit of a narrow market...

[–] Chiral@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, that's kinda the typical approach. I'm hoping I can piece together more performance and less noise for the same price. Kind of a waste of a battery and screen if I'm just going to plug it into a station every time... The comparable laptops do alright but they get damn hot and they cost $5k

[–] Chiral@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes! I've even tried it, but the issue I ran into was that my Starlink home connection is... spotty (I really need to move dishy up higher to get fewer obstructions). This results in network dropouts every couple of minutes which is suuuuper frustrating when you're doing 3D modeling work. Also, working over a remote connection seemed pretty clunky at times with the 3D model manipulation, def not as smooth as local.

[–] Chiral@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Haha well it's my company, so I can do whatever I want?

 

Hey Lemmy, I need some recommendations for a CPU-intensive slightly mobile rig. I run a lot of engineering simulations and I need a computer that I can move between my home and work on a semi-frequent basis. I'm looking for something more powerful than a laptop and I'll have monitors/peripherals at both locations. Maybe a mini-ITX in an HTPC style case? The sims don't really make use of GPU, so integrated graphics is just fine. They multi-thread a bit, but there are still single-core bottlenecks in the process, so highest single-core performance is probably pretty important. It's also got to handle 128GB of DDR5 and a M.2 PCIe NVMe SSD.

A lot of the faster CPUs seem to need some serious cooling (100W+ TDP!) and I'd rather not have a jet engine roaring constantly since this thing will be sitting right on the desk next to me eating 100% CPU most of the time. Are there small form factor cases that can support water cooling? When Intel says a CPU has a processor base power of 125W, but a Max Turbo Power of 253W, does that imply that the 253W can't be sustained even with enough cooling?