[-] Draces@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Mine would be embarrassed

[-] Draces@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Why talk down to someone with a valid point calling them a sweet child and then complain you're not an expert, I don't get what your stance is here

[-] Draces@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

You can't just be a good cryptographer to break a sound encryption. It doesn't work that way. You're basically saying you know p=np which is... I'll just say bold

[-] Draces@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

lazy automatically means black folk ain't shit

Wtf are you on about?

[-] Draces@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Tell that to chromium

[-] Draces@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

No I don't think you could take a picture of your ballet in the 19th century when it was ruled illegal. So if it was illegal when the exchange was entirely faith based, how are reasoning pictures changes anything? That's not why the law was created and this exchange can absolutely be considered vote buying

[-] Draces@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

By this logic it's historically impossible to buy votes since you can't go into the polling location with them. Buying a view is an agreement about what a person has agreed to vote for. Musk has made a very clear offer to give money for someone who agrees to support the first amendment and that a vote for Trump is supporting the the first amendment. If the person doesn't vote for Trump, by Musk's stated beliefs, they are not supporting the first amendment and therefore disqualified from receiving the money. He is attempting to buy votes.

[-] Draces@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Still, again, my point is regarding what is implied in this article which is that Musk is paying people to vote for Trump. You do agree that this is not the case, correct?

No. Musk goes to a rally and says vote for Trump to preserve your first amendment rights then offers money to people pledging to support first amendment rights. Stop playing dumb

[-] Draces@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Musk did go to a Trump rally and say specifically voting for Trump is to preserve your first amendment rights and then offered to pay for people to vote to protect their first amendment rights. That seems legally questionable to me.

[-] Draces@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Also why shouldn't things like this be brought up again? It should be brought up as long as he's on the bench or the party that got him there still has any authority

[-] Draces@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

We didn't call the cold war a world war and that wasn't in a single country

[-] Draces@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago

I would have agreed with you in 2016 but if the last 8 years has shown me anything it's that Trump is normalizing the worst of people. He keeps saying the quiet part out loud till the right is screaming it

view more: next ›

Draces

joined 7 months ago